From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
> >>
> >> >They gave their 95% confidence interval.
> >>
> >> The news said that the questions that were asked was if
> >> anybody knew anybody who died. Adding these up will not
> >> give a correct count.
> >
> >The 'news' was wrong then.
> >
> >In most cases ( ~90 % ) a death certificate was shown.
>
> And the death certificates said that all the deaths were
> due to US killing them?

Not at all.

The survey was to determine death rates from all causes pre and post
war. Quite simple really.

Pre-war of course there weren't any deaths from either US killings or
any insurgents.

Graham


From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> You are wrong.

NO.

You are.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> What is really frustrating about these people is that
> they don't have to know any history.

I reckon in any competition, my knowledge of history would knock yours
into the proverbial cocked hat.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. The history we (US kids) learned in elementary school seems
> >> to have been a lot of myth. What a waste of learning time.
> >
> >Now stop to think what else might be based on popular myths ?
>
> One of them is that Europe doesn't teach history their kids any
> better than the US.

Eh ? I assume English isn't your first language.

Graham

From: T Wake on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:ehd5mb$8qk_008(a)s884.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <57udnU2j2uYdBqrYnZ2dnUVZ8qGdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>,
> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>>
>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:eh7ksa$8ss_018(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>> In article <bFtZg.15970$e66.4970(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:eh53ce$8qk_005(a)s847.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>>>> In article <OF7Zg.17270$6S3.4818(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
>>>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:eh2k1e$8qk_002(a)s777.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>>>>>> In article <e97b6$4534dd17$4fe728b$30183(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
>>>>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can state my hidden agenda; preserve the world's accumulated
>>>>>>>>> knowledge. Religious extremists have the goal of destroying
>>>>>>>>> most of that knowledge. Islamic extremists have the goal of
>>>>>>>>> destroying it all because it's a product of Western civilization.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Religious extremism is always the result of one of the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A) Insanity
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>B) Desire for power, control, and wealth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None of the above. Fear. Pure, simple terror.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OK, if you must, then "fear of losing power, control and wealth".
>>>>>>Witness
>>>>>>the fear-mongering among the Religious Right in the current election
>>>>>>campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am. More alarming is the message of the Democrats who keep implying
>>>>> that there isn't any problem.
>>>>
>>>>Citation, please. In your zeal to support the current administration,
>>>>you're not listening carefully.
>>>
>>> Listen to any of them.
>>
>>
>>Any and all conversations? Are they really that repetative?
>
> Yes, the public speeches of the Democrats campaigning are
> that repetitive. You should pay especial attention to everything
> they don't talk about.

They don't talk about what measures they will take to prevent alien
attacks - from what I have heard anyway. I don't generally follow American
political debates.

<snip snide commentary>