Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:24 T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:7433b$453a35b5$49ecfae$3982(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >> >>>unsettled wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>unsettled wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>T Wake wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>If the West changed to Islamic based societies life would >>>>>> >>>>>>>continue largely as normal. >>>>>> >>>>>>Normal in Islamic based societies is brothers killing >>>>>>brothers in religious fanaticism, thank you very much! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No it isn't. >>>> >>>>This sort of denial is meaningless. >>> >>> >>>It's definitely as valid as your daft assertion ! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I was used to >>>>hearing it from very young school children who >>>>didn't like the facts they were denying byt had >>>>absolutely no grounds for argument. >>>> >>>>It is obvious you have no knowledge of history. >>> >>> >>>Au contaire, my knowldege of history is very good. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Brother killing brother was not stopped by >>>>conversion to Islam. It remains prevalent in >>>>the culture. >>> >>> >>>OK then. Cite please. >> >>google islam killing 8,370,000 hits (arguments both ways) > > > http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=christian+killing > > 17,300,000 hits. > > Is there a point to your post? Sure, he asked for a cite about brother killing brother, so I gave him a URL to follow. Now you've tried to turn it into a dicksize war. Goody for you. Mindless followers like you will be sidetracked. Thanks!
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:26 T Wake dsitorts as only a Muslim can: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:85443$453a3c1c$49ecfae$4118(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>What is really frustrating about these people is that >>>>they don't have to know any history. >>> >>> >>>I reckon in any competition, my knowledge of history would knock yours >>>into the proverbial cocked hat. >> >> >>History has two distinct parts: >> >>1) Knowledge of facts >> >>2) Understanding historical facts in context >> >>You lose. > Lose what? All you did was write two sentences. There is _no_ indication > based on the posts in this thread that you or BAH are able to carry out both > the points you mentioned. BAH manages part of the time. I manage most of the time. > So, in reality, you lose. Thanks for playing. > Try again soon. Your followers will love this. Glad to be of service, strengthening their resolve to follow you since you're a weak force. Lol
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:27 T Wake wrote: <snip>
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:28 T Wake wrote: <snip>
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:29
T Wake wrote: <snip> |