Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:41 T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > Yet you allow, and encourage, capitalist extremism to prosper. Untrue. We have laws restricting monopolistic practices what are part and parcel of capitalism. > Extremism flourishes where fear and ignorance exist. And where power has been handed over to extremists in order to remain alive. > You are fanning the flames of extremism, and feel > that _your_ extremisim is acceptable as long as it > combats _their_ extremism. Did you forget to take some of your meds today? >>Now I understand. You're a Muslim or a MUslim shill. > No, as always, you don't understand. You live with assumptions and > McCarthy-esque claims and assertions. You answer without specificity, leaving my argument intact.
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:42 T Wake dsitorts as only a Muslim can: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:c82fa$453a411d$49ecfae$4310(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >>T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >>>I actually go out of my way to try and comprehend your point of view. You >>>obviously choose not to show me the same courtesy and, when your >>>standpoint becomes untenable, you fall back on accusing me of deliberate >>>misunderstanding. >> >>>Well done. >> >>She's right. You're a Muslim or a Muslim shill. > > > Nonsense. But keep making your assumptions based on whatever you want to > make up > > >>That being said, >>you're so brainwashed your "truths" are limited to what you've >>been "carefully taught." (see _South Pacific_) > > > Your idiocy overwhelms me. You have once again left my arguments intact. Thank you.
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:42 The thing which is "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> continues to demonstrate her total lack of comprehension in news:c9703$453a4349$49ecfae$4370(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > >> This is a line you really do not want to take. You cherry pick segments >> of history which you hope will > > support your viewpoints. > > Thanks for this succinct demonstration of your most > prevalent distortion technique. See below. I realise that like JoeBlow and some others here you have serious difficulty with comprehension - largely because you already have more preconcevied ideas than is healthy - but please try to keep up. My example below is a demonstration of why cherry picking segments of history is false. If you were able to follow the thread you would see it in context. Sadly, you are obsessed with maintaing your viewpoint and blind to everything else. >> Are you talking about yourself here? Are you saying that because the >> Turks killed the Christians in Anatolia they will all do it again? Which >> ignore both the recent treatments in Islamic countries _and_ the >> treatment of Christians by the likes of Salah Adin. > > Here you go, an out of context snippet of history which has > little to no parallel. Yes, see. It is a problem when people do that isn't it. Thank you for agreeing with me. >> _You_ are the person who is using Afghanistan under the Taliban as an >> example of what would happen. > > And does it again here What was out of context about what I said there? BAH accused others of using modern Islamic societies as a model of what would happen, yet she used Taliban Afghanistan as the model. You really are having comprehension problems, aren't you?
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:43 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:188a2$453a4228$49ecfae$4310(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorted as only a Muslim can: > > snip > >>>Brother killing brother was not stopped by >>>conversion to Islam. It remains prevalent in >>>the culture. >> >> >> No more or less prevalent than in any other culture. Thank you for agreeing with me. Americans must be proud to have people like you.
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:48
"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:9dd44$453a4b74$49ecfae$4540(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > > >> Yet you allow, and encourage, capitalist extremism to prosper. > > Untrue. We have laws restricting monopolistic practices > what are part and parcel of capitalism. The laws are good, yet this does not falsify my claim. >> Extremism flourishes where fear and ignorance exist. > > And where power has been handed over to extremists > in order to remain alive. Yes. As I have said numerous times, sacrificing freedom to stay alive is a mistake. I am glad you agree with me. >> You are fanning the flames of extremism, and feel that _your_ extremisim >> is acceptable as long as it >> combats _their_ extremism. > > Did you forget to take some of your meds today? Do you want me to explain it in simple term for you? >>>Now I understand. You're a Muslim or a MUslim shill. > >> No, as always, you don't understand. You live with assumptions and >> McCarthy-esque claims and assertions. > > You answer without specificity, leaving my argument intact. Your argument had no specificity and never started intact. I am not a Muslim. Even if I was it is not relevant in anything other than your obscure mindset and determination to demonise all who are "different" to you. You have made an assumption and demand I give specifics to deny it. This is untrue. Now, as I said, you adhere to your McCarthy-esque approach which assumes I am a Muslim because I disagree with you. You haven't read enough to see what my view point is, you simply assume it. I am proud of you. |