Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:06 T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > This is a line you really do not want to take. You > cherry pick segments of history which you hope will > support your viewpoints. Thanks for this succinct demonstration of your most prevalent distortion technique. See below. > Are you talking about yourself here? Are you saying that because the Turks > killed the Christians in Anatolia they will all do it again? Which ignore > both the recent treatments in Islamic countries _and_ the treatment of > Christians by the likes of Salah Adin. Here you go, an out of context snippet of history which has little to no parallel. > _You_ are the person who is using Afghanistan under the Taliban as an > example of what would happen. And does it again here > Wow.
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:10 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>Sigh! It doesn't have to be practical nor easy. Why do you >>think every other country has OSHA rules in place? > It certainly has to be practical. Learn the definition of the word: > capable of being practiced. That's practicable, not the use of the word she intended. > Look, you brainless git. In case it's not mortifyingly obvious, I work in > the chemical industry (and yes, I do frequently work near the places of > production, as you implied I didn't in another sorely misinformed post), and > I'm telling you, one branch or another of the Federal government knows > exactly what every single chemical plant that produces more than a few > pounds per year in this country is making, and who they are shipping to. Seems like you took a does of something that scrambled your brains. > I'm starting to think you and your useless sycophant are nothing more than > trolls to keep the discussion rolling, and rack up as many postings as > possible. If anyone cares what Lucas thinks raise your hand! See that! No one cares. Actually you're losing so badly in this "discussion" I wonder why you continue.
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:15 T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: >>You're clearly a sock puppet adhering to >>someone else's agenda. > Hahaha. Nice one. You are a funny guy. Whose agenda am I adhering to? Your Mullah's, unless you are a Mullah! > Are > you JoeBloe? (I doubt it because you can use more than two or three words at > a time). My identity is unimportant. My statements are what I offer. > Generally speaking, your posts are meaningless and full of badly thought out > comments. Good work all round really. Thank you. Coming from you I take this as your ultimate compliment.
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:19 T Wake dsitorts as only a Muslim can: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ehd5ug$8qk_010(a)s884.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <45378D92.1903B626(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>They gave their 95% confidence interval. >>>> >>>>The news said that the questions that were asked was if >>>>anybody knew anybody who died. Adding these up will not >>>>give a correct count. >>> >>>The 'news' was wrong then. >>> >>>In most cases ( ~90 % ) a death certificate was shown. >> >>And the death certificates said that all the deaths were >>due to US killing them? > > > What has the US killing them being the cause of death got to do with > anything? Have you read the posts you are replying to? > > If the US attacks destroyed a water pipe and someone died from drinking > polluted water, what would the cause of death be recorded as? > > The study looked at numbers and rates of deaths. Since the US-led occupation > both have gone up. Is that an indicator of causal forces? You are now > heading into the argument that unless every death was the result of a _US_ > soldier it had nothing to do with the occupation. This is nonsense. Where is the record of lives saved by our presence? What about the medicines and medical care and the food we've been providing?
From: unsettled on 21 Oct 2006 12:22
T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:a8a9c$453a3a5b$49ecfae$4118(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I know I do not write clear enough for all values of IQs. >>> >>> >>>Mine's 152. >>> >>>What's yours ? >> >> >>You're good at taking IQ tests. Doesn't actually >>mean you're "smart." > You are a funny guy. That too, but it doesn't negate my comment above. > I have realised you are a Left Wing plant to try and > discredit the Right Wingers in this thread. Well done. This is very good. The more confused you and your brothers are the better for me. |