From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> In the US, until an item is deemed to be a risk to national
> security, the businesses who make, sell, and trade that item
> are NOT under government control. This a difference between
> how business is run in the US and socialistic based economies.

Bwahahahahahahahaha !

Graham

From: MooseFET on

jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
[....]
> Clinton's plans only dealt with Bin Laden? What about the other
> 99% of the extremists who intend to make mesess?

This is simply false.

Things I can remember, off the top of my head, Clinton admin doing:

(A)
The Counter-Terrorism Act of IIRC 1995

(B)
Conducted terrorism threat assessment of every federal facility.

(C)
Pressed the Saudi government to reduce support for the Wahhabis. This
I remember because it was a near perfect failure. The Saudi government
had made a faustian bargain with the Wahhabiists and the US depended on
Saudi oil so much that there was no leaverage point.

From: Spehro Pefhany on
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:22:12 +0100, the renowned Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> Which word of the phrase "World Trade Center"
>> do you not understand?
>
>In a much earlier post you suggested that Islam was anti-capitalist / business.
>Maybe you'd like to take a look at this ? Or maybe you'd prefer to continue
>living in ignorance of the facts ?
>
>http://www.bahrainwtc.com/
>
>Graham

Or the skyline of KL Malaysia:

http://www.taipan.at/Downloads/Wallpapers/Malaysia_Petronas_1024.jpg


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff(a)interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
From: MooseFET on

jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> In article <1161700854.976916.304350(a)k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
[....]
> >The nuclear power industry has a history of making false promices and
> >screwing up badly. As a result the idea of making a new power plant
> >isn't very popular. Strangley enough research into the theory that
> >makes them go is still fairly popular. This may be a good thing
> >because a "new generation of safe power plants" may just sell.
>
> The only person who is willing to say those "bad" words, nuclear
> power plant, is Bush.

That is simply false.

At least the these have talked about it at length:

Dennis Kucinich,
Senator Domenici,
Sen. Stabenow

I'm sure there are many more but I'm lazy.


> I haven't heard Republicans say them and
> Democrats always leave it off their list of items we have
> to do to become less dependent on oil imports.

Once again simply false. Try a bit of googling.

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >Try the implicit right not to be dragged into a war unilaterally
> >by the Executive branch of the government.
>
> Huh?

Huh indeed !

Graham