Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 26 Oct 2006 10:53 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> Here is a religious extremism whose stated goal is to destroy > >> Western civilization. > > > >Cite ? > > > > > >> The compensation for those who die > >> while doing this work for them is only addressed to males. > >> The idealism puts all women out of society (cover and > >> no transport out of the house). This is not getting back > >> to the old ways of Muslim living (from I've read). > > > >So you reckon that all Muslim women would happily say OK to this ? > > The women did in Iran. They got the old ways back. Then they > were sorry. You're hugely mistaken. 70% of Iranian university graduates are women. Doesn't sound much like being under the yoke to me. Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Oct 2006 10:54 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > >> Here is a religious extremism whose stated goal is to destroy > >> Western civilization. > > > >Evidence, please. This, once again, is at best an extremist > >over-interpretation of what anyone has actually said. > > You have been given evidence. Nothing credible. > You do not accept it. I'm not > going to repeat posts and I don't the others, who also > posted evidence, will either. Your blindness is quite astonishing. Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Oct 2006 10:55 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message > >> > >> > If somebody > >> > says "looks like rain" I bet you say "prove it or shut up." > >> > >> That would be based on observational evidence, not anecdotal evidence. An > >> assumption based on anecdotal evidence would be "it rained the past two > >> Tuesdays, so therefore I conclude that it always rains on Tuesday." > > > >An absence of clouds would make the assertion look pretty flaky anyway ! > > You haven't been in the mountains. It rains without clouds there ? Graham
From: John Fields on 26 Oct 2006 11:04 On 26 Oct 2006 10:42:04 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote: >T Wake wrote: > >> Nazi Germany was a nation with a powerful miliary machine and >> advanced technology. > > >You make it too easy :) hehe.... no no, not so. > > >Germany was, and is a powerful technic developing nation. >Baden-W?rtemberg (Capital Stuttgart) for example (BOSCH, Mercedes >Benz..). > --- Have you learned how to goose-step yet? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 26 Oct 2006 11:07
lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > > Haven't you ever wondered why he hadn't if they [Clinton's anti-terror > plans] were so > comprehensive and complete and effective? > > He did, some of them, while he was in office. Implementation of these > things takes time. Bush was unable to do anything in 9 months Because he was too busy taking time off to play golf. Graham |