Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 6 Nov 2006 13:06 <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:IpI3h.6215$B31.3084(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > news:lbOdnX8VM4DzptLYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d(a)pipex.net... >> >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:einbet$8qk_006(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <454DBACA.3CA76BD2(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Jamie" <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote in >>>>> message >>>>> > Eeyore wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Why would anyone spend that much on a watch ? I can't figure it. >>>>> >> Aside >>>>> >> from bragging rights of course ! >>>>> >> >>>>> > you can't figure it out? why does that >>>>> > not surprise me? >>>>> >>>>> Because not everybody in the world allows the cost of their >>>>> possessions to >>>>> define them as human beings? >>>> >>>>A film and sound editor acquaintance of mine who's worked in the USA >>>>said he >>>>couldn't live there long-term in part because he found the use of wealth >>>>to >>>>define yourself to be offensive. >>> >>> Then he didn't mix with the usual US types. He only saw a slice >>> of US. >> >> Funny that isn't it. Just goes to show, you can get a totally false >> impression of a nation and it's people simply by mixing with the wrong >> types. >> >> Wonder where else that could be relevant. > > You really do need to stop being so subtle. It doesn't work on this > particular audience. Sorry, the irony of the posts gets to me sometimes :-)
From: T Wake on 6 Nov 2006 13:08 <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:PCI3h.6223$B31.1372(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > news:OKKdnVqrU4EB39LYRVnyjQ(a)pipex.net... >> >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:einfa9$8qk_004(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <NPw3h.6024$B31.873(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> <snip> >>> >>>>So now you're changing your story? >>> >>> No. >>> >>>> First you say you refuse to talk to >>>>actual Muslims because you get your data from books. Now you're saying >>>>you >>>>talk to Muslims. Which is it? >>> >>> nice try. The answer is none of the above. >>> >>> Make another list. >> >> It seems difficult to think of an answer other than you do or don't talk >> to Muslims. >> >> Do you commune with their spirits? > > In which case she should stop whining about not being able to talk to dead > Muslims. ROTFLMAO. I wish I had picked up on that myself.
From: unsettled on 6 Nov 2006 13:08 Lloyd Parker wrote: > In article <12489$454cc7d3$4fe7077$9514(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>T Wake wrote: >> >> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:eihvrr$8ps_002(a)s792.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> >>> >>>>In article <454B8A9B.7C879864(a)hotmail.com>, >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>That is why I'm trying to point out that having insurance is >>>>>>>>not a guarantee you will get access to treatment when you need it. >>>>>>>>The only thing our politicians are trying to do is to make >>>>>>>>the insurance available to all from a single payer, the US >>>>>>>>government. This will cause a decrease in access. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>How ? >>>>>> >>>>>>Doctors are also avoiding taking on new Medicare patients because >>>>>>they don't paid for the services delivered in a timely manner. I >>>>>>don't know how long the delay is now, but Dukakis years had a >>>>>>payment delay of 9 months to 2 years. That means that a >>>>>>pharmacist or a doctor had to wait that long before he got >>>>>>paid for a service he provided years before. >>>>> >>>>>So all you're doing here is criticising the failings of your current >>>>>system. >>>> >>>>Quite >>>> >>>> >>>>>so. It needs radical overhaul. >>>> >>>>To go to a single payer system implies an expansion of the Medicare >>>>system. So a national health insurer will not work well. >>> >>> >>>Why not? >>> >>> >>> >>>>Congress even did something sensible and passed an extraordinary >>>>insurance. The youngsteres who ran AARP caused their subscribers >>>>to get it repealed. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>It's rare here to find a doctor who *doesn't* do NHS work. >>>> >>>>Is his license tied to volunteering? >>> >>> >>>NHS work is not "volunteer" work. >>> >>> >> >>In the American lexicon, any work which pays less than >>the maximum going rate is "volunteering." >> > > > So, teachers are volunteers. Policemen, firemen, ... > > Airline pilots who work for smaller airlines are volunteers too... I am pleased to announce that you and I live in rather different worlds.
From: T Wake on 6 Nov 2006 13:14 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:einjea$b1$1(a)blue.rahul.net... > Now the US is feared as one might a rabid dog. A country of 300 million > mostly intelligent and honorable people does not deserve to be brought so > low in the eyes of the world. We can only hope that some good people step > forward, as they have in the past, and turn the country back onto the > right path. Well said.
From: lucasea on 6 Nov 2006 13:20
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message news:J_CdnRLnmqmN59LYRVnyvg(a)pipex.net... > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:PCI3h.6223$B31.1372(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> news:OKKdnVqrU4EB39LYRVnyjQ(a)pipex.net... >>> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:einfa9$8qk_004(a)s943.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>> In article <NPw3h.6024$B31.873(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, >>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>So now you're changing your story? >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>>>> First you say you refuse to talk to >>>>>actual Muslims because you get your data from books. Now you're saying >>>>>you >>>>>talk to Muslims. Which is it? >>>> >>>> nice try. The answer is none of the above. >>>> >>>> Make another list. >>> >>> It seems difficult to think of an answer other than you do or don't talk >>> to Muslims. >>> >>> Do you commune with their spirits? >> >> In which case she should stop whining about not being able to talk to >> dead Muslims. > > ROTFLMAO. I wish I had picked up on that myself. I'm starting to think she's a troll, just repeatedly lobbing up illogical softballs and sitting back watching people hit them out of the park. I'd think this, except I've seen her in other discussions on sci.* groups, some of which spill over into sci.chem. But then again, her posts always seems to have a complete lack of technical understanding or information, so maybe she is just a troll. Eric Lucas |