Just plain fucked...
in [Design]
|
Prev: Freq. Independent Phase Shifter
Next: Please, DO NOT forget the only thing that matters on this planet........................……..
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 10 May 2010 21:31 On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:39 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >Sure, but why do they make you install a virtual machine and a whole >nother OS to run 16 bit apps? Why didn't they include a dosboxy thing? > >Microsoft is a mess. > >John No John. The only mess here is you, acting as if you are a man, when it is clear that it is only in the numerical case. You're a goddamned self impotent idiot. Bwuahahahahahahahahahahahahahha!
From: Tim Williams on 10 May 2010 22:14 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:hjahu5d35h5ej11fe9ml9hlvepjceek3jn(a)4ax.com... > Sure, but why do they make you install a virtual machine and a whole > nother OS to run 16 bit apps? Why didn't they include a dosboxy thing? John, It's not a Windows thing. In 64 bit ("long") mode, 16 bit instructions don't work (either generate a fault or are mapped to other instructions). 32 bit is the new 16 bit (32 bit programs run in long mode for compatability). Anything that emulates (NOT virtualizes) 16 bit operation is an additional program, like DOSBox or the Virtual Machine stuff. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
From: John Larkin on 10 May 2010 23:01 On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:31:12 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra(a)thusspoke.org> wrote: >On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:39 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>Sure, but why do they make you install a virtual machine and a whole >>nother OS to run 16 bit apps? Why didn't they include a dosboxy thing? >> >>Microsoft is a mess. >> >>John > > No John. The only mess here is you, acting as if you are a man, when >it is clear that it is only in the numerical case. > > You're a goddamned self impotent idiot. How many kids do you have? I have two, and two grandkids. So far. That I know of. John
From: StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt on 10 May 2010 23:21 On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:01:57 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:31:12 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt ><Zarathustra(a)thusspoke.org> wrote: > >>On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:39 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>Sure, but why do they make you install a virtual machine and a whole >>>nother OS to run 16 bit apps? Why didn't they include a dosboxy thing? >>> >>>Microsoft is a mess. >>> >>>John >> >> No John. The only mess here is you, acting as if you are a man, when >>it is clear that it is only in the numerical case. >> >> You're a goddamned self impotent idiot. > >How many kids do you have? > >I have two, and two grandkids. So far. That I know of. > >John You obviously also have no clue what that word means as well.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 11 May 2010 05:31
On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:18:49 +0100, John Devereux <john(a)devereux.me.uk> wrote: >StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra(a)thusspoke.org> writes: > >> On Mon, 10 May 2010 22:13:21 GMT, asdf <asdf(a)nospam.com> wrote: >> >>> WINE *does not run under a vitual machine or emulated >>>hardware*. >> >> >> Total bullshit. >> >> You took their claim as fact. You are a gullible twit. >> >> It MUST run UNDER a virtual machine and hardware MUST be emulated to do >> so. > > >What, they secretly implemented a virtual machine instead of just >replacing the windows DLLs with their own ones like they claim? > >The sneaky bastards! Linux uses "DLLs"? I was unaware. > >Thanks for exposing this conspiracy! Translation IS emulation. Get thyselfeth a clueeth. |