Light is the unified form of the universe
in [Physics]
|
From: purple on 26 May 2010 15:26 On 5/26/2010 1:21 PM, mpc755 wrote: > On May 26, 2:15 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> Stop hawking nonsense. > > A particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double slit [...] Obviously you don't understand plain English.
From: BURT on 26 May 2010 15:27 On May 26, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > > > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > You invent ways of saying you are more correct than everyone. But you > > > > are fooling yourself that way. There is no such thing. And if your > > > > theory is wrong in one way it is wrong period. > > > > > You are also a vain person putting yourself above others in science > > > > when that is not what you were created to be. You need to face God. > > > > Puting off the correction of yourself is why you are in trouble. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > I am saying I am more correct than everyone else when discussing > > > E=mc^2 in terms of what occurs physically in nature because I am more > > > correct. > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > and matter is energy. > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the > > > mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The > > > physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter > > > and aether is energy. > > > > Mass is conserved.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > There is no such thing as a most correct theory. If it is wrong in any > > way it is of course wrong. > > Aether Displacement has not been shown to be incorrect in any way, to > date. You keep saying that. Prove that. You can make a blank slate theory do anything. By the way you do not have a theory. You have an idea. You need to provide the math for everyone to see. > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > There is no such thing. Mitch Raemsch > > > Aether flow is completely correct. That is a different story. > > You misuse the aether concept. Even though it is real you misrepresent > > it. I can tell you what it really is. > > > Mitch Raemsch You use the concept of aether. I see you want to look like you have something that you do not.
From: PD on 26 May 2010 15:30 On May 26, 2:27 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 26, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > > > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > > > > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > > > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > You invent ways of saying you are more correct than everyone. But you > > > > > are fooling yourself that way. There is no such thing. And if your > > > > > theory is wrong in one way it is wrong period. > > > > > > You are also a vain person putting yourself above others in science > > > > > when that is not what you were created to be. You need to face God. > > > > > Puting off the correction of yourself is why you are in trouble. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > I am saying I am more correct than everyone else when discussing > > > > E=mc^2 in terms of what occurs physically in nature because I am more > > > > correct. > > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the > > > > mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The > > > > physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter > > > > and aether is energy. > > > > > Mass is conserved.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > There is no such thing as a most correct theory. If it is wrong in any > > > way it is of course wrong. > > > Aether Displacement has not been shown to be incorrect in any way, to > > date. > > You keep saying that. > Prove that. You can make a blank slate theory do anything. > By the way you do not have a theory. You have an idea. > You need to provide the math for everyone to see. > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > There is no such thing. > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Aether flow is completely correct. That is a different story. > > > You misuse the aether concept. Even though it is real you misrepresent > > > it. I can tell you what it really is. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You use the concept of aether. I see you want to look like you have > something that you do not. And MPC, when even Mitch Raemsch (self-proclaimed two-time Nobel Prize winner and holder of the Portland Hobo of the Year award) tells you this, then it should be a strong indicator to you that you are fooling no one. PD
From: mpc755 on 26 May 2010 15:36 On May 26, 3:26 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/26/2010 1:21 PM, mpc755 wrote: > > > On May 26, 2:15 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> Stop hawking nonsense. > > > A particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double slit > > [...] > > Obviously you don't understand plain English. Only if you can not read a complete English sentence. Here is a complete sentence you may be able to understand: A particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double slit experiment is evidence the particle always exits a single slit. Since the above sentence may be too complex for you to understand, I will rewrite it: If you always detect a particle exiting a single slit in a double slit experiment then that is evidence the particle always exits a single slit. Always detected a particle exiting a single slit in a double slit experiment is evidence the particle always exits a single slit is nonsense only to those who choose to believe in the Copenhagen interpretation of QM. It is the Copenahageners who are hawking nonsense. Why is the particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double slit experiment whether the particle be a photon or a C-60 molecule? Because the particle ALWAYS exits a single slit. Every experiment ever performed ALWAYS detects the particle exiting a single slit. This is experimental evidence of the particle ALWAYS exiting a single slit. If your theory does not support the experimental evidence of the particle ALWAYS entering and exiting a single slit then your theory is incorrect and incomplete. My preferred concept of a photon is that it propagates as a wave through the aether (decompressed) and is detected as a quantum of mæther (compressed). The ability of the wave to be detected as a quantum of mæther occupies a very small region of the wave itself. In a double slit experiment the photon wave enters and exits both slits. The photon 'particle' enters and exits a single slit. The photon wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the photon 'particle' travels. Detecting the photon 'particle' causes decoherence of the photon wave and there is no interference. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the photon 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit because the photon 'particle' always enters and exits a single slit. Mæther has mass. Aether and matter have mass. Aether and matter are different states of mæther. Aether is uncompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 26 May 2010 15:40
On May 26, 3:27 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 26, 4:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > > > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > > > > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > > > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > You invent ways of saying you are more correct than everyone. But you > > > > > are fooling yourself that way. There is no such thing. And if your > > > > > theory is wrong in one way it is wrong period. > > > > > > You are also a vain person putting yourself above others in science > > > > > when that is not what you were created to be. You need to face God. > > > > > Puting off the correction of yourself is why you are in trouble. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > I am saying I am more correct than everyone else when discussing > > > > E=mc^2 in terms of what occurs physically in nature because I am more > > > > correct. > > > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the > > > > mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The > > > > physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter > > > > and aether is energy. > > > > > Mass is conserved.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > There is no such thing as a most correct theory. If it is wrong in any > > > way it is of course wrong. > > > Aether Displacement has not been shown to be incorrect in any way, to > > date. > > You keep saying that. > Prove that. You can make a blank slate theory do anything. > By the way you do not have a theory. You have an idea. > You need to provide the math for everyone to see. > Aether Displacement is shown to be correct every time a double slit experiment is performed. The reason why the particle is always detected exiting a single slit is because the particle always enters and exits a single slit and it is the aether wave which enters and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference. Every video you want of an atomic bomb explosion is evidence of the increase in volume of the mæther as matter transition to aether. > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory, to date. > > There is no such thing. > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Aether flow is completely correct. That is a different story. > > > You misuse the aether concept. Even though it is real you misrepresent > > > it. I can tell you what it really is. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You use the concept of aether. I see you want to look like you have > something that you do not. |