Light is the unified form of the universe
in [Physics]
|
From: mpc755 on 25 May 2010 23:33 On May 25, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 25, 8:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <ad93061a-0a3a-4786-88ee-d6aceb43583d@ > > 34g2000prs.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > On May 25, 6:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?... > > > > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > > > > of wordage? > > > > > thus quoth: > > > > The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is > > > > energy. > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > thusNso: > > > > wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have > > > > both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, > > > > the general confusion over mathematical duality, > > > > where you can't actually use both of the pair > > > > *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" > > > > a la Pascal. > > > > > a more proper statment would be, like, > > > > a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, > > > > no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because > > > > young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. > > > > > so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, > > > > what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > > > > > > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > > > > > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > > > > > not both. > > > > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other!http://wlym.com > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > E=mc^2. > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > Mass is conserved. > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > Mitch Raemsch I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing creates energy. Mass is conserved. The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is energy.
From: BURT on 25 May 2010 23:37 On May 25, 8:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 25, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 25, 8:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In article <ad93061a-0a3a-4786-88ee-d6aceb43583d@ > > > 34g2000prs.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > On May 25, 6:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?... > > > > > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > > > > > of wordage? > > > > > > thus quoth: > > > > > The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is > > > > > energy. > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > thusNso: > > > > > wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have > > > > > both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, > > > > > the general confusion over mathematical duality, > > > > > where you can't actually use both of the pair > > > > > *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" > > > > > a la Pascal. > > > > > > a more proper statment would be, like, > > > > > a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, > > > > > no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because > > > > > young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. > > > > > > so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, > > > > > what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > > > > > > > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > > > > > > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > > > > > > not both. > > > > > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other!http://wlym..com > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > E=mc^2. > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > and matter is energy. > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > Mass is conserved. > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I don't believe you. You are vain. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 25 May 2010 23:40 On May 25, 11:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 25, 8:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 25, 8:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <ad93061a-0a3a-4786-88ee-d6aceb43583d@ > > > > 34g2000prs.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > > On May 25, 6:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?.... > > > > > > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > > > > > > of wordage? > > > > > > > thus quoth: > > > > > > The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is > > > > > > energy. > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > thusNso: > > > > > > wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have > > > > > > both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, > > > > > > the general confusion over mathematical duality, > > > > > > where you can't actually use both of the pair > > > > > > *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" > > > > > > a la Pascal. > > > > > > > a more proper statment would be, like, > > > > > > a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, > > > > > > no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because > > > > > > young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. > > > > > > > so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, > > > > > > what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > > > > > > > > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > > > > > > > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > > > > > > > not both. > > > > > > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other!http://wlym.com > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > Mass is conserved. > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > Mitch Raemsch I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing creates energy. Mass is conserved. The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is energy.
From: BURT on 25 May 2010 23:47 On May 25, 8:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 25, 11:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 25, 8:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 25, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 8:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article <ad93061a-0a3a-4786-88ee-d6aceb43583d@ > > > > > 34g2000prs.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > > > On May 25, 6:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?.... > > > > > > > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > > > > > > > of wordage? > > > > > > > > thus quoth: > > > > > > > The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is > > > > > > > energy. > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > thusNso: > > > > > > > wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have > > > > > > > both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, > > > > > > > the general confusion over mathematical duality, > > > > > > > where you can't actually use both of the pair > > > > > > > *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" > > > > > > > a la Pascal. > > > > > > > > a more proper statment would be, like, > > > > > > > a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, > > > > > > > no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because > > > > > > > young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. > > > > > > > > so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, > > > > > > > what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > > > > > > > > > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > > > > > > > > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > > > > > > > > not both. > > > > > > > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other!http://wlym.com > > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy.. > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > and matter is energy. > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > Mass is conserved. > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You invent ways of saying you are more correct than everyone. But you are fooling yourself that way. There is no such thing. And if your theory is wrong in one way it is wrong period. You are also a vain person putting yourself above others in science when that is not what you were created to be. You need to face God. Puting off the correction of yourself is why you are in trouble. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 26 May 2010 00:08
On May 25, 11:47 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 25, 8:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 11:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 25, 8:33 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 11:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 25, 8:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <ad93061a-0a3a-4786-88ee-d6aceb43583d@ > > > > > > 34g2000prs.googlegroups.com>, macromi...(a)yahoo.com says... > > > > > > > > On May 25, 6:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?... > > > > > > > > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > > > > > > > > of wordage? > > > > > > > > > thus quoth: > > > > > > > > The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is > > > > > > > > energy. > > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > > > thusNso: > > > > > > > > wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have > > > > > > > > both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, > > > > > > > > the general confusion over mathematical duality, > > > > > > > > where you can't actually use both of the pair > > > > > > > > *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" > > > > > > > > a la Pascal. > > > > > > > > > a more proper statment would be, like, > > > > > > > > a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, > > > > > > > > no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because > > > > > > > > young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. > > > > > > > > > so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, > > > > > > > > what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > > > > > > > > > > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > > > > > > > > > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > > > > > > > > > not both. > > > > > > > > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other!http://wlym.com > > > > > > > > Mpc hijacked Einstein's E=mc Squared! > > > > > > > Not hijacked, leveraged in order to explain what the energy is in > > > > > > E=mc^2. > > > > > > > A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter. > > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > No. You hiujacked it to use for your vanity. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > > and matter is energy. > > > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > > > Mass is conserved. > > > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > I don't believe you. You are vain. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in > > nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. > > > I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. Mass does not convert > > to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from > > matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the > > increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > Mæther decompressing creates energy. > > > Mass is conserved. > > > The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically > > affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is > > energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > You invent ways of saying you are more correct than everyone. But you > are fooling yourself that way. There is no such thing. And if your > theory is wrong in one way it is wrong period. > > You are also a vain person putting yourself above others in science > when that is not what you were created to be. You need to face God. > Puting off the correction of yourself is why you are in trouble. > > Mitch Raemsch I am saying I am more correct than everyone else when discussing E=mc^2 in terms of what occurs physically in nature because I am more correct. I have the most correct explanation of what occurs physically in nature in terms of E=mc^2, to date. I am explaining how mass is conserved in E=mc^2. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing creates energy. Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter and aether is energy. Mass is conserved. |