Light is the unified form of the universe
in [Physics]
|
From: spudnik on 25 May 2010 21:51 wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, the general confusion over mathematical duality, where you can't actually use both of the pair *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" a la Pascal. a more proper statment would be, like, a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > not both. --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 25 May 2010 21:55 so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?... don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum of wordage? thus quoth: The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing creates energy. Mass is conserved. thusNso: wait a second; now, you're saying light can't have both electrical & magnetical components?... sort of like, the general confusion over mathematical duality, where you can't actually use both of the pair *at the same time*, unless it is a "two-column proof" a la Pascal. a more proper statment would be, like, a photon is a boson, not neccesarily a momentumless, no-dimensional point of light, and mainly because young et al showed taht all of the essential properties are wavy. so, if light is the one thing that might not really be a particle, what is one thing that mightnot really be a wave? > Light is always a dual wave. The proof that light is not a particle > lies in the fact that it has to be in either one of those waves but > not both. --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no other! http://wlym.com
From: mpc755 on 25 May 2010 22:04 On May 25, 9:55 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > so, if A=mcc, where does the "creates energy" come into it?... > don't you see, where you've stuck yourself, a blythe conundrum > of wordage? > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The material is mæther. Mæther has mass. Aether is uncompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. Aether and matter have mass. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Mæther decompressing creates energy. Mass is conserved. The matter expanding in volume as it transitions to aether physically affects the neighboring aether and matter. This physical effect is energy.
From: spudnik on 25 May 2010 22:16 yeah, shout it out: maether is aether plus mater! --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no aether! http://wlym.com
From: mpc755 on 25 May 2010 22:26
On May 25, 10:16 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > yeah, shout it out: > maether is aether plus mater! > > --Pi, the surfer's canonical value -- except no aether!http://wlym.com Aether and matter are different states of the same material. The material is mæther. Mæther has mass. Aether is uncompressed mæther and matter is compressed mæther. If you want to think of mæther as aether plus matter then that is correct. Mæther is the material of space. All of space. Mæther occupies all of three dimensional space. |