Light isn't a particle
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest
Next: Aether Displacement
From: mpc755 on 23 May 2010 11:59 On May 23, 11:56 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On May 23, 11:40 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 23, 11:24 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On May 23, 10:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 23, 9:43 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 10:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 10:15 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > That does't answer the question. > > > > > > > > > > "What established the light-particle's direction before > > > > > > > > > something altered it?" > > > > > > > > > > Why does light choose to illuminate your slit experiment > > > > > > > > > rather than a passenger aeroplane that needs the distance > > > > > > > > > to the nearest landing field? Are the emitters of light > > > > > > > > > equipped with gun barrels or cattle chutes to direct > > > > > > > > > the energy to the desired task? > > > > > > > > > > Sue... > > > > > > > > > The light emitter is described here: > > > > > > > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonIn... > > > > > > > > That references a Helium Neon laser. > > > > > > > > The shape and directiviy is discussed here and > > > > > > > particle models don't seem to offer much. > > > > > > > >http://www.rp-photonics.com/gaussian_beams.html > > > > > > > > Sue... > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > > > > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle." > > > > > > > The external field acting on the 'particle' is the associated wave. > > > > > > > "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present > > > > > > theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave > > > > > > where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite > > > > > > natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always > > > > > > be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is > > > > > > located." > > > > ================ > > > > > > > The internal motion rhythm of the particle is the same as that of the > > > > > > wave at the point where the particle is located. > > > > > > Do you have some evidence for the "internal motion rhythm" > > > > > of the light-particle? Does it have gears and wheels > > > > > shirring around? > > > >http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/ekspong/http://en.... > > > > > > Sue... > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > OK... You don't, so cut the nonsense. > > > Evidence that birds can fly is not evidence > > > that pigs can fly. > > > > Sue... > > > I am agreeing with de Broglie that it is not known exactly how the > > particle and wave interact as one. That is not to say there is not a > > physical particle and a physical wave. > > ========== > > > > > My preferred concept of a photon is the following: > > http://superstruny.aspweb.cz/images/fyzika/foton.gif > > There is nothing new about that. Nearly everyone incompetent > with Maxwell's equations prefers that image. That doesn't > lend it any fidelity or usefulness. > > Do you expect people that have invested in farm tractors to > swap them for shovels and hoes so they can play in the > garden with you? > > Learn some physics! > > Classical Electromagnetism: > An intermediate level coursehttp://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/lectures.html > > Sue... 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case of an external field acting on the particle." "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is located." de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of the wave. In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits. A C-60 molecule displaces the aether. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The ZC-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference.
From: BURT on 23 May 2010 12:00 On May 23, 8:54 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 23, 11:52 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 23, 8:45 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 23, 11:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Stop repeating. > > > > > Light is an oscillating wave. There is no particle. > > > > My question proves it. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > You are refuting your own statements? > > > > "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > wave and there is no interference. > > > The way a light wave is absorbed is by oscillating into electric mass > > after it has been caught. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > "light wave ... oscillating into ... mass" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Please stop repeating. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 23 May 2010 12:02 On May 23, 12:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Please stop repeating. > > Mitch Raemsch I am simply quoting your statements where you define a photon as consisting of a physical wave and a physical particle. Are you refuting your own statements? "light wave ... oscillating into ... mass" is the photon 'particle'. "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference.
From: BURT on 23 May 2010 12:07 On May 23, 9:02 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 23, 12:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Please stop repeating. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > I am simply quoting your statements where you define a photon as > consisting of a physical wave and a physical particle. > > Are you refuting your own statements? > > "light wave ... oscillating into ... mass" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > wave and there is no interference. You are a parot. Please stop repeating. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 23 May 2010 12:09
On May 23, 12:07 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 23, 9:02 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 23, 12:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Please stop repeating. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > I am simply quoting your statements where you define a photon as > > consisting of a physical wave and a physical particle. > > > Are you refuting your own statements? > > > "light wave ... oscillating into ... mass" is the photon 'particle'. > > > "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > wave and there is no interference. > > You are a parot. Please stop repeating. > > Mitch Raemsch You still have not answered the question. Are you refuting your own statements? "light wave ... oscillating into ... mass" is the photon 'particle'. "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference. |