Light isn't a particle
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest
Next: Aether Displacement
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 21:53 On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > being original? > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > the next step. > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > Mitch Raemsch Your full sentence was: "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of absorption." The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon 'particle'. Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next step. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference.
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 21:55 On May 22, 9:51 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On May 22, 9:26 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:02 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 8:57 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 8:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 5:11 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Light waves collapse into matter. > > > > > > > The light wave collapses and is detected as a quantum of matter.. The > > > > > > light wave collapses and is detected as a 'particle' of matter. > > > > > > > In a double slit experiment, when detectors are placed at the exits to > > > > > > the slits the photon wave collapses and is detected as a quantum of > > > > > > matter. The ability of the photon wave to collapse and be detected as > > > > > > a quantum of matter travels a single path. The ability of the photon > > > > > > wave to collapse and be detected as a quantum of matter travels a > > > > > > single path and enters and exits a single slit. The ability of the > > > > > > photon wave to collapse and be detected as a quantum of matter is the > > > > > > photon 'particle'. > > > > > > > The photon wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment and creates interference upon exiting the slits which > > > > > > alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Placing detectors at the > > > > > > exits to the slits causes the photon wave to collapse which causes > > > > > > decoherence of the wave and there is no interference. > > > > > > > Light waves collapse into matter is the 'particle' associated with the > > > > > > photon wave. > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > step. > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > wave and there is no interference. > > > > What established the light-particle's direction before > > > something altered it? > > > > Sue... > > > This is a good explanation of a single photon double slit experiment: > > > 'Single Photon Interference > > quantum nature of light - wave-particle duality - probability - double > > slit experiment'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonIn... > > > de Broglie's 'guidance formula' discusses the particle occupying a > > very small region of the wave: > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > by the double solution theory > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the > > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case > > of an external field acting on the particle." > > That does't answer the question. > > "What established the light-particle's direction before > something altered it?" > > Why does light choose to illuminate your slit experiment > rather than a passenger aeroplane that needs the distance > to the nearest landing field? Are the emitters of light > equipped with gun barrels or cattle chutes to direct > the energy to the desired task? > > Sue... The light emitter is described here: 'Single Photon Interference' http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonInterference/SinglePhotonInterference.html
From: BURT on 22 May 2010 21:58 On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Your full sentence was: > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > absorption." > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > 'particle'. > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > step. > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 22:00 On May 22, 9:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Your full sentence was: > > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > absorption." > > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > > 'particle'. > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > step. > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating > into electric particle is how it is done. > > Mitch Raemsch "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" is the photon 'particle'. Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next step. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference.
From: BURT on 22 May 2010 22:14
On May 22, 7:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 22, 9:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > > > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Your full sentence was: > > > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > absorption." > > > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > > > 'particle'. > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > step. > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating > > into electric particle is how it is done. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" is the photon > 'particle'. > No the wave is all that exists. It is both sin and sphere. It is without particle. Mitch Raemsch |