Light isn't a particle
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest
Next: Aether Displacement
From: Sue... on 22 May 2010 22:15 On May 22, 9:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > That does't answer the question. > > > "What established the light-particle's direction before > > something altered it?" > > > Why does light choose to illuminate your slit experiment > > rather than a passenger aeroplane that needs the distance > > to the nearest landing field? Are the emitters of light > > equipped with gun barrels or cattle chutes to direct > > the energy to the desired task? > > > Sue... > > The light emitter is described here: > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonIn... That references a Helium Neon laser. The shape and directiviy is discussed here and particle models don't seem to offer much. http://www.rp-photonics.com/gaussian_beams.html Sue...
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 22:17 On May 22, 10:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 22, 7:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass.. > > > > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Your full sentence was: > > > > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > absorption." > > > > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > > > > 'particle'. > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > step. > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating > > > into electric particle is how it is done. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" is the photon > > 'particle'. > > No the wave is all that exists. It is both sin and sphere. It is > without particle. > > Mitch Raemsch So, you are refuting the following statements? "Light collapsing into ... particle." "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference.
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 22:32 On May 22, 10:15 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On May 22, 9:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > That does't answer the question. > > > > "What established the light-particle's direction before > > > something altered it?" > > > > Why does light choose to illuminate your slit experiment > > > rather than a passenger aeroplane that needs the distance > > > to the nearest landing field? Are the emitters of light > > > equipped with gun barrels or cattle chutes to direct > > > the energy to the desired task? > > > > Sue... > > > The light emitter is described here: > > > 'Single Photon Interference'http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scidemos/QuantumRelativity/SinglePhotonIn... > > That references a Helium Neon laser. > > The shape and directiviy is discussed here and > particle models don't seem to offer much. > > http://www.rp-photonics.com/gaussian_beams.html > > Sue... 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case of an external field acting on the particle." The external field acting on the 'particle' is the associated wave. "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is located." The internal motion rhythm of the particle is the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is located.
From: BURT on 22 May 2010 22:35 On May 22, 7:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 22, 10:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 7:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 9:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > > > > > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > Your full sentence was: > > > > > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > absorption." > > > > > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > > > > > 'particle'. > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > step. > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating > > > > into electric particle is how it is done. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" is the photon > > > 'particle'. > > > No the wave is all that exists. It is both sin and sphere. It is > > without particle. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > So, you are refuting the following statements? > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Light sphere is captured by an electric infinitely small particle and oscillates its energy into it. This is absorption. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 22 May 2010 22:49
On May 22, 10:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 22, 7:17 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 10:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 22, 7:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 9:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 22, 6:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:40 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:37 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:18 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 6:08 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 9:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > absorption. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." - Correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding mpc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding? You just said it yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > > > > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Light oscillates into electric point energy. This is absorption of > > > > > > > > > > > > > light by an electric particle that is infinitely small. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt your understanding. You are always repeating. Why not try > > > > > > > > > > > being original? > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > Because you refuse to back up your own statements. > > > > > > > > > > > Are you refuting your own statement where you said: > > > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > > > If you're not then take this understanding of the nature of physics to > > > > > > > > > > the next step. > > > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Poppycock. Go somehwhere else. > > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > > 'Poppycock' is the best you can do to support your statement: > > > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Light is spread out energy oscillating into infinitely dense mass. > > > > > > > This is the phenomenon of electric particle absorption. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > Your full sentence was: > > > > > > > "Light collapsing into electric matter particle is the phenomenon of > > > > > > absorption." > > > > > > > The "Light collapsing into electric matter particle" is the photon > > > > > > 'particle'. > > > > > > > Now, take this understanding of the nature of physics to the next > > > > > > step. > > > > > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > > > > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > > > > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > > > > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > > > > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > > > > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > > > > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Only electric matter can absorb electromagnetic energy. Oscillating > > > > > into electric particle is how it is done. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" is the photon > > > > 'particle'. > > > > No the wave is all that exists. It is both sin and sphere. It is > > > without particle. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > So, you are refuting the following statements? > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle." > > > "Oscillating into electric particle is how it is done" > > > "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. > > > If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit > > experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. > > The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single > > path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit > > experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle > > enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and > > creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' > > travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > wave and there is no interference.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Light sphere is captured by an electric infinitely small particle and > oscillates its energy into it. This is absorption. > > Mitch Raemsch "Light ... is ... small particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Light collapsing into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. "Oscillating into ... particle" is the photon 'particle'. If detectors are placed at the exits to the slits in a double slit experiment the 'particle' is always detected exiting a single slit. The ability of light to collapse into a particle travels a single path. The light wave enters and exits both slits in a double slit experiment. The ability of the light to collapse into a particle enters and exits a single slit. The light wave exits both slits and creates interference which alters the direction the 'particle' travels. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated wave and there is no interference. |