From: Char Jackson on 20 Apr 2010 14:43 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:01:40 -0700, Mike Easter <MikeE(a)ster.invalid> wrote: >Char Jackson wrote: >> Mike Easter > >>> That sounds to me like you think that the same device, the DSL >>> modem/router can be used as an access point, as if it were >>> multifunctional in both those capacities. > >> He may have seen or heard that a wireless router can easily be >> repurposed as an access point, but I don't think the same is true when >> starting with a modem-router combo unit, is it? >> >First; I don't know what he meant. Second; I wouldn't speak >'generically' that there is no such thing anywhere as a router with a >DSL modem that can't also be an access point. Third; I still don't >comprehensively understand why this discussion is limited to just these >two significantly different products and (yet) no others. Fourth: I >also don't comprehensively understand exactly what kind of target >mission the device we should be looking for should have. > >Somehow I sense that some salesman or sales process said, "Here are two >different dsl-modems 'on sale'/forsale, which one do you want?" just as >the shoe salesman limits his sales pitch to the woman to (just) 2 >different shoes so that she won't be confused by being offered too many >choices. Great summary. I'm no farther ahead than you are.
From: atec7 7 ""atec77 " on 20 Apr 2010 08:41 AnthonyL wrote: > Further to my recent posting of "Wireless connection driving me crazy" > my supplier has special offers on: > > Linksys by Cisco WAG120N Wireless N150 ADSL Modem Router > NETGEAR DG834G v5 Wireless-G ADSL Modem Router > > This is small office/home use, 2 or 3 connections. Max broadband > speed available is 1Mb/s. > > I'll be buying two units, one will be primarily a router and the other > will primarily be an AP, but it suits for redundancy purposes to have > two identical units. > > Any opinions of which one's to go for? Should I be concerned at the > lack of external aerial on the Linksys? I primarily want reliability > of connection. > > Many thanks > Buffalo if you can find one comes with wrt std
From: Mike Easter on 20 Apr 2010 09:22 AnthonyL wrote: > my supplier has special offers on: What does 'my supplier' mean in this context? Why would you be limiting your shopping in any way based on whatever your 'supplier' is offering 'on special'? I'm sure the retail price of those two different products is very different, as one is N and the other is G. There are lots and lots of sales on G technology nowadays. -- Mike Easter
From: AnthonyL on 20 Apr 2010 09:34 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:22:26 -0700, Mike Easter <MikeE(a)ster.invalid> wrote: >AnthonyL wrote: > >> my supplier has special offers on: > >What does 'my supplier' mean in this context? > >Why would you be limiting your shopping in any way based on whatever >your 'supplier' is offering 'on special'? > >I'm sure the retail price of those two different products is very >different, as one is N and the other is G. > >There are lots and lots of sales on G technology nowadays. > Given that I can buy at similar costs one of the two stated products and that I have had a lot of bad experiences with a number of brands leading to an earlier posting where people recommended that I ditch the C&W product I am using and buy something else do you have a sensible opinion on which, if any, would be a better buy? PS I tend to buy from suppliers that are easy to buy from in terms of any credit terms, returns policy, guarantees, customer service, goods delivery tracking etc etc, and one of these suppliers is offering the products I am looking at. -- AnthonyL
From: Mike Easter on 20 Apr 2010 10:47 AnthonyL wrote: > Mike Easter >> AnthonyL wrote: >> >>> my supplier has special offers on: >> What does 'my supplier' mean in this context? >> >> Why would you be limiting your shopping in any way based on whatever >> your 'supplier' is offering 'on special'? > PS I tend to buy from suppliers that are easy to buy from in terms of > any credit terms, returns policy, guarantees, customer service, goods > delivery tracking etc etc, and one of these suppliers is offering the > products I am looking at. > Those very considerations are the numerous reasons that I buy most of my electronic goods including routers from my local electronics store. That store has an excellent returns policy; shortly after purchase the return policy is basically 'no questions asked' - that is, the item doesn't even have to be broken, just that it turned out that I didn't want it after all. Then there is a significantly longer period in which I can return an item and get a refund or a replacement because of problems with the device. And thus and especially there is no problem about shipping costs or return shipping considerations both of which are huge considerations for something which might not work satisfactorily in your environment. I also don't understand why you say this: AnthonyL wrote: > I'll be buying two units, one will be primarily a router and the other > will primarily be an AP, but it suits for redundancy purposes to have > two identical units. That sounds to me like you think that the same device, the DSL modem/router can be used as an access point, as if it were multifunctional in both those capacities. What does the above cited sentence mean? -- Mike Easter
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: SpeedTouch 585(i) v6: Allow New Devices? Next: Linksys or Netgear |