Mass-Energy Equivalence [Math]

Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.

From: Bill Hobba on 1 May 2010 18:43

On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> aether's state of displacement.

And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
is its state of actuality - ie non existent.

Thanks
Bill

From: spudnik on 1 May 2010 21:46

he seems to be unaware of the neccesity in a"proof,"
of "neccesity AND sufficiency," as first stated
by Leibniz (although having one or the other is,
still, very good -- if actually so .-)

> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it

thus:
so, you applied Coriolis' Force to General Relativity, and
**** happened?

> read more »

thus:
with only the "trivial" solutions on the curves o'Fermatttt,
it sounds like a "necessary but insufficient" proof;
PdF certainly could have done it.

> I have been interested in the odd and even aspect of FLT , and
> when Cn = 1. May I have your reference? DRMARJOHN

thus:
so, your coinage of pi(a,b) is the same as pi(b) - pi(a); now,
can you say thr proof as a wordprolemmum?

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.takeTHEgoogolOUT.com

From: mpc755 on 2 May 2010 02:30

On May 1, 6:43 pm, Bill Hobba <bho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 28/04/2010 9:49 PM, mpc755 wrote:
>
> > The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> > matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> > aether's state of displacement.
>
> And the state of the aether as determined by out inability to detect it
> is its state of actuality - ie non existent.
>
> Thanks
> Bill

Aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is executed.
Aether is detected in the Casimir Effect.

A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
the aether.

Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
nucleus which is the matter which is the object.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.

A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
there is no interference.

The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.

Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
plates forces the plates together.

While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the
exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule is detected exiting a single
slit. While a C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed and
removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
interference pattern.

Explain how this is possible.

In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
displacement wave and the C-60 molecule ALWAYS enters and exits a
single slit in a double slit experiment. It is the displacement wave
in the aether which enters and exits multiples slits. The displacement
wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the
direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detectors at the exits to the
slits causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the
wave into chop) and there is no interference.

Should I post the '<crickets>' response to you non-response now, or
should I wait 24 hours.

From: mpc755 on 2 May 2010 02:39

From: spudnik on 2 May 2010 16:35

Young's two-hole experiment showed moire' (interference) patterns
of light, not aether -- or, how
can you *interpret* such an observation "to be" aether?

were you, also, the one who disrpoved Coriolis' force?

> Should I post the '<crickets>' response to your non-response now, or
> should I wait 24 hours?

THUS:
you did not state, which *way* the old harbors are, now,
"from the coast;" they are no, drydocks?

thus:
(momentum) p = mv;
does it "dimensionally analyze" to units of force,
as "ma" does?

as for the rest, you don't make any quantitative claims,
to uphold your so-called theory, perhaps
as a matter of being unpracticed in English (so,
try to read Shakespeare, dood .-)

thus:
one should read the acolyte of Hubbard at Shell;
his two books on Peak Oil, really give a good precis
of the whole business -- although
they were published way too late, for him to say,
I tol'y'so, as he did.
the best theory of Earth processes is by a mechanical engineer,
who worked at an America oil co.
BP's mini-dysaster in the Gulf is certainly suspicsous, but
keep in mind the quantification viz-a-vu the Exxxon spill
by Puget Sound; the organic seeps in the Gulf are
about one Valdez per annum -- with massive pumping.

thus:
the original "KE" equation is known
as Leibniz' *vis viva*; whereas others had thought
it was just the first power of speed (i.e. Galileo, I think).

thus:
he seems to be unaware of the neccesity in a"proof,"
of "neccesity AND sufficiency," as first stated
by Leibniz (although having one or the other is,
still, very good -- if actually so .-)
> state of the aether, as determined by our inability to detect it.

thus:
so, you applied Coriolis' Force to General Relativity, and
**** happened? > read more »

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.takeTHEgoogolOUT.com