Micoshaft oriffice no more! - Use OpenOffice
in [UK Linux]
|
Prev: (F3) Find Files can't work, after installing SP3 ; os says a
Next: Installing package ending rpm.run ?
From: Conor on 15 Jan 2010 14:37 In article <pan.2010.01.14.22.25.34.868163(a)stovell.nospam.org.uk>, Phil Stovell says... > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:15:40 +0000, Conor wrote: > > > Says the man who claims to have worked for the only �40m T/O company that > > has never ever used macros in Exel. > > It's Excel, not Exel. > > Are you sure you you're not confusing formulae with macros? OO has both. Do you actually know what a macro is? -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on 15 Jan 2010 14:39 In article <hio63l$la0$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann says... > Well, several german cities seemed to be quite content with OO. Seems OO > provided everything they needed. For example: The computers in Munich > which still run windows have OO installed Several German cities eh? How much of the rest of the German Civil Service was using OOo? -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on 15 Jan 2010 14:39 In article <pan.2010.01.14.22.38.12.518987(a)stovell.nospam.org.uk>, Phil Stovell says... > The UK Government used to have (may still have) a policy of only using > software that is ISO standards compliant. OO is, I'm not sure about MSO. UK Govt runs on MSO. -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on 15 Jan 2010 14:41 In article <hiofvn$8db$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, RonB says... > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:57:29 +0000, Gordon wrote: > > > Conor wrote: > >> In article <slrnhkstrh.uit.jedi(a)nomad.mishnet>, JEDIDIAH says... > >>> On 2010-01-13, Conor <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> In article <slrnhksal6.5sr.jedi(a)nomad.mishnet>, JEDIDIAH says... > >>>> > >>>>> Open Office is good enough to apply negative price pressure to > >>>>> MSO. > >>>> OOo is no use to anyone who wants to do more than a basic expenses > >>>> spreadsheet or homework. > >>> ...which as I said before is the vast majority of users. > >>> > >> Wrong. The vast majority of office users are in a corporate > >> environment. OOo is not suitable for their needs. > >> > >> > > And your reasoning for that is? > > OO 3.1 is as every bit as suitable as Office 2003, which you would know > > if you'd used it. Your comments so far tell us you've NEVER used it. > > Exactly. Most people who use Microsoft Word don't even know how to use its > spellchecker (or they ignore it). Unlike OOo, it works so well they don't need to. -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.
From: Conor on 15 Jan 2010 14:42
In article <20100115074439.2116.51071.XPN(a)gordon-laptop>, Gordon says... > > Conor wrote: > > > >> > > Says the man who claims to have worked for the only �40m T/O company > > that has never ever used macros in Exel. > > > > > > No claim. It's true. > > Get back to selling laptops. At least its better than sitting at home on the dole as you do. -- Conor www.notebooks-r-us.co.uk I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally. |