From: Frank Bemelman on 7 Aug 2006 13:30 "Jim Yanik" <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> schreef in bericht news:Xns981793BA1B0Djyanikkuanet(a)129.250.170.83... > Saddam was waiting for UN embargoes to fade away,then he'd restart his WMD > programs.He would also have a feeling of success and of beating the West > at Jim Yanik and his crystal ball. -- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
From: John Larkin on 7 Aug 2006 13:32 On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:09:51 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <sGWttRp0vP1EFwXI(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk>, >jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk says... >> In message <ams9d2tksts40a3lndlfb3m1vu9391ridl(a)4ax.com>, dated Sat, 5 >> Aug 2006, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> >> writes >> >It has so much BIST that it barely works at all. >> >> BIST? British Ingenuity Still Triumphs? > >No, British Ingenuity Sells Triumphs. Evil, ugly cars. I was always an MG guy, myself. John
From: Frank Bemelman on 7 Aug 2006 13:34 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> schreef in bericht news:2bsed2lrh07brpplqqhuod9ora8phrcet3(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:00:40 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>Jim Yanik wrote: >> >>> Saddam was using Oil-for-Food money to rebuild his palaces and fund WMD >>> programs >> >>There weren't any WMDs ! >> >>How many times do you need to be reminded ? > > There were no WMDs found because they were moved before we got > there. Maybe that was the will of God too eh? But honestly, are you insane or something? -- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 7 Aug 2006 13:36 John Larkin wrote: > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 05:55:35 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Phat Bytestard wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:11:01 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> Frank Bemelman wrote: >>>>>> In short, point us to your list of democracies - both the one for 1950 and >>>>>> the one for 2000. >>>>> Does the actual number matter here? This is just one of JL's famous smoke >>>>> curtains, pretending as if the increase in democracies is an all American >>>>> achievement, for which the world - again - has to be thankful or something. >>>> Indeed. The USA probably contributed fairly insignificantly to that number. >>> Can you really be *THAT* stupid? >> Do please by all means name those countries made into democracies by the USA since >> 1950. >> >> Graham >> > > You could start with Poland and Hungary and those guys. Strange. It was Gorbachev and Yeltsin who deserve the credit. I don't recall them being Americans. Dirk
From: John Larkin on 7 Aug 2006 13:37
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:12:31 +0200, "Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote: > >An eye for an eye, not 10 eyes for an eye. Israel has just >slaughtered too many. It has lost all of its credibility. >It has no longer the benefit of the doubt. That's funny; FB quoting the Talmud to make an argument! John |