New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 7 Aug 2006 14:28 On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:11:06 +0200, "Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> Gave us: >The US has turned into a goddamn terrorist nation. I hope they beat your door down. Saddam's mass graves state otherwise. Name any other country that has *ANY* torture chambers, much less the hundreds that Saddam had charge over. I think you'll find that ALL countries you could name are on the bad side of the issue. Why is that? Hundreds of years old, fucked in the head mentality that's why. Get a clue, dumbfuck.
From: Eeyore on 7 Aug 2006 14:26 Phat Bytestard wrote: > On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:57:11 GMT, joseph2k <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> > Gave us: > > >Phat Bytestard wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:29:14 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" > >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> Gave us: > >> > >>> > >>> Yes, it does. If you're in the paper products or produce business. > >>>It would be damn hard to make money selling apples and other fruit > >>>without growing them on trees. It would also be very hard to build > >>>decent homes without lumber, which grows on trees, as well. > >> > >> Yep... even the media that the "money" got printed on came from > >> trees. > >Can't speak of any other Country but US notes are on 100% cotton bond. > >No trees involved. > > Ever seen a cotton plant that goes unharvested? There's a big difference. When you use trees to make wood you cut the tree down. Is that how you reckon cotton is harvested ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 7 Aug 2006 14:27 Phat Bytestard wrote: > An attacked otherwise peaceful nation has every right to 100% > obliterate their attacker. Does Israel have a seat at the UN ? I think you'll find they'd have something to say about that idea. Graham
From: Eeyore on 7 Aug 2006 14:27 Phat Bytestard wrote: > An attacked otherwise peaceful nation has every right to 100% > obliterate their attacker. Your lust for blood is again noted btw. Graham
From: John Woodgate on 7 Aug 2006 14:18
In message <92ued29drs5ivb9483hvqsveon0m14h012(a)4ax.com>, dated Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> writes >It isn't his power sources in question, it is his intentions with the >spent fuel rods, The US is objecting to enrichment of uranium beyond the 5% or so required for peaceful purposes. If there are plans to extract Pu239 from fuel rods, there won't BE any spent fuel rods for about 5 years. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK |