New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:28 On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:48:58 +0100, John Woodgate <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> Gave us: >In message <iogid2pd7udgeknltr9q8osf4nmvumuikr(a)4ax.com>, dated Wed, 9 >Aug 2006, Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> writes > >> We fire bombed Dresden for the UK. We didn't need no stinkin' >>bombsights. It was at night, and we dropped a huge salvo. > >I don't think the US did any night bombing at that time; it was RAF at >night and USAAF in daylight, suffering large losses. Dresden, in particular, was a night raid, and was a US operation.
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:30 On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:33:06 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> Gave us: >Eeyore wrote: >> >> Phat Bytestard wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:21:30 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> As did the USA with their Norden bombsight that didn't actually >>>> deliver the goods in practice. >>> That would be Norton. >> >> No it wouldn't. Can't get anything right as usual...... >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norden_bombsight >> >> >>> We fire bombed Dresden for the UK. We didn't need no stinkin' >>> bombsights. It was at night, and we dropped a huge salvo. >> >> There was no " for the UK " about it. >> >> Graham >> >It was actually 'for' the USSR according to documents from the time. You're an idiot. It was a retaliation for the V-2s into London. We did not speak with the USSR at the time, and certainly didn't plan and carry out operations for them.
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:32 On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:57:29 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > >> > Phat Bytestard wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:21:30 +0100, Eeyore >> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >> >>> As did the USA with their Norden bombsight that didn't actually >> >>> deliver the goods in practice. >> >> That would be Norton. >> > >> > No it wouldn't. Can't get anything right as usual...... >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norden_bombsight >> > >> > >> >> We fire bombed Dresden for the UK. We didn't need no stinkin' >> >> bombsights. It was at night, and we dropped a huge salvo. >> > >> > There was no " for the UK " about it. >> > >> > Graham >> >> It was actually 'for' the USSR according to documents from the time. >> >> Dirk > >Yes of course. To assist their advance. > You're an idiot. Bombing a town's factories could slow a war effort. FIRE bombing an entire city has NO military value whatsoever. It was a retaliation for hitler's bombs into London. Period.
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:35 On 9 Aug 2006 14:58:30 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> Gave us: >John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in >news:8e5id216ookd9v1j8k7hpoet1du097hv02(a)4ax.com: > >> On 8 Aug 2006 21:18:15 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> wrote: >> >>>John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in >> >>>> --- >>>> The problem in the middle east is a "Hatfields and McCoys" mentality >>> >>>Not really.Israel would just as soon leave the Lebanses alone. >> >> --- >> Right, thanks. >> >> > >Interestingly,it's IRAN and SYRIA that are simply using Lebanon as their >*battlefield* against Israel,and the Lebanese are just dupes.they get their >country demolished,their peoples killed or maimed,and Iran and Syria get >the benefits,and none of the negatives. Precisely correct observation!
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:38
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:28:45 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> Gave us: >Keith wrote: >> In article <91gid25upsoq7uvato0h0g9egur7rh5svs(a)4ax.com>, >> phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org says... >>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:37:13 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> >>>> John Woodgate wrote: >>>> >>>>> In message <4jqtm0F9b7r6U1(a)individual.net>, dated Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Dirk >>>>> Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> writes >>>>>> Why not take Bin Laden at his word, and read *why* he attacked the US? >>>>> Citation? >>>> "We decided to destroy towers in America," because "we want to regain the >>>> freedom of our nation," Bin Ladin said. >>>> >>> What "nation" does Bin Laden call "his"? >>> >> Islam. >> >That's right. >And Bush and the FBI know *exactly* where the Nation of Islam is hiding >out in the US... >Something must be done! > They are on all three sides of us. We got them right where they want us. Then, we got sympathetic retarded bastards like you in the mix, so we are totally surrounded. |