New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: joseph2k on 9 Aug 2006 23:43 Phat Bytestard wrote: > On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:57:48 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>It was actually the UN weapons inspectors that did the looking and very >>good they were at it too. Hence why there was nothing to find when we >>invaded. Simple really. > > You're an idiot. They in fact, were dissallowed access to over 15 > "palaces". > > Guess what we found in them. And then we invaded, searched those palaces and found exactly nothing. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:44 On 9 Aug 2006 23:54:46 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> Gave us: >(actually many war crimes,as it's also prohibited to use weapons to >deliberately cause or enhance civilian casualties;the rockets Hezbollah >fires have been modified to include thousands of ball bearings to kill or >maim civilians.I've seen pictures of the damage one of these small- >warhead/bearing-enhanced rockets causes;it's very nasty.And the warheads >themselves are too small to be intended to do damage to military targets.) >> Another 100% complete VIOLATION of the UN charters as well as the Geneva convention.
From: Phat Bytestard on 9 Aug 2006 23:48 On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:45:05 GMT, joseph2k <quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> Gave us: >No. Let's be a bit more honest; the mostly decent, productive citizens >(Israel) are accosted by organized criminals (Hezbollah), who hide behind >other decent citizens; so that when the decent people, that they slapped >repeatedly, come looking for them to "slap them back", the other decent >people get hurt. Damn! Looks like you got one right.
From: joseph2k on 9 Aug 2006 23:52 Frank Bemelman wrote: > "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> schreef in bericht > news:i3hfd25fdedi9i14st8ipb9421va08gpve(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:34:33 +0200, "Frank Bemelman" >> <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote: >> >>>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> schreef in bericht >>>news:2bsed2lrh07brpplqqhuod9ora8phrcet3(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:00:40 +0100, Eeyore >>>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Jim Yanik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Saddam was using Oil-for-Food money to rebuild his palaces and fund >>>>>> WMD >>>>>> programs >>>>> >>>>>There weren't any WMDs ! >>>>> >>>>>How many times do you need to be reminded ? >>>> >>>> There were no WMDs found because they were moved before we got >>>> there. >>> >>>Maybe that was the will of God too eh? >> >> --- >> Maybe, but I think more likely the will of Saddam. >> --- > > If he still had had a few, he'd probably had used them, > instead of moving them elsewhere. I doubt Syria would > have been prepared to take the risk of providing a > safe storage place for his WMD. > >>> But honestly, are you insane or something? >> >> --- >> Not as far as I can tell, but maybe you've got evidence to prove me >> wrong? Or something? > > It was a rhetoric question. You're piling up the evidence yourself ;) > Yes, and by that evidence John is sane and you, Frank, are not. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: Don Bowey on 10 Aug 2006 01:13
On 8/9/06 8:28 PM, in article tt9ld2hcpl7tsgc5p7ailndcfdcrbnoefo(a)4ax.com, "Phat Bytestard" <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:48:58 +0100, John Woodgate > <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> Gave us: > >> In message <iogid2pd7udgeknltr9q8osf4nmvumuikr(a)4ax.com>, dated Wed, 9 >> Aug 2006, Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard(a)getinmahharddrive.org> writes >> >>> We fire bombed Dresden for the UK. We didn't need no stinkin' >>> bombsights. It was at night, and we dropped a huge salvo. >> >> I don't think the US did any night bombing at that time; it was RAF at >> night and USAAF in daylight, suffering large losses. > > Dresden, in particular, was a night raid, and was a US operation. |