New essay on Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem
in [Logic]
|
Prev: Solutions manual to Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 3E Norman E Dowling
Next: Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
From: Scott H on 30 Sep 2009 15:16 On Sep 30, 11:04 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > I also suggest it's a good idea to set all this stuff about > suffering, people pulling your strings, etc. aside when > discussing logical and mathematical matters. I know. It was mostly a message to the one-starrer. I don't think he understands how much danger he and others are creating. A thousand straws sum to the weight of a brick. At any rate, I have proposed that G refers to its 'reflection' or Goedel code, which I have called G' instead of t. A number of people have told me that G and G' are the same statement. At this point, I won't even deny that they are: I'll simply call G' the statement to which G refers, proceed to G'', etc., and call it endless reference. Does G = G' = G'' ... ? I'll leave that to you.
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 30 Sep 2009 15:20 Scott H <zinites_page(a)yahoo.com> writes: > I know. It was mostly a message to the one-starrer. I don't think he > understands how much danger he and others are creating. This is just silly. Google Groups ratings aren't creating any danger. > At any rate, I have proposed that G refers to its 'reflection' or > Goedel code, which I have called G' instead of t. That you have. You have also completely ignored all comments and questions regarding your various baffling assertions about such matters. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon mann nicht sprechen kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: Scott H on 30 Sep 2009 15:40 On Sep 30, 11:04 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > I also suggest it's a good idea to set all this stuff about > suffering, people pulling your strings, etc. aside when > discussing logical and mathematical matters. I know. It was mostly a message to the one-starrer. I don't think he understands how much danger he and others are creating. A thousand straws sum to the weight of a brick. At any rate, I have proposed that G refers to its 'reflection' or Goedel code, which I have called G' instead of t. A number of people have told me that G and G' are the same statement. At this point, I won't even deny that they are: I'll simply call G' the statement to which G refers, proceed to G'', etc., and call it endless reference. Does G = G' = G'' ... ? I'll leave that to you.
From: Scott H on 30 Sep 2009 15:42 On Sep 30, 3:20 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > Scott H <zinites_p...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > I know. It was mostly a message to the one-starrer. I don't think he > > understands how much danger he and others are creating. > > This is just silly. Google Groups ratings aren't creating any danger. Fallacy of division. > > At any rate, I have proposed that G refers to its 'reflection' or > > Goedel code, which I have called G' instead of t. > > That you have. You have also completely ignored all comments and > questions regarding your various baffling assertions about such matters. If I had, I wouldn't have responded to them. I even updated my essay based on one of your comments.
From: Scott H on 30 Sep 2009 15:42
On Sep 30, 3:20 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > Scott H <zinites_p...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > I know. It was mostly a message to the one-starrer. I don't think he > > understands how much danger he and others are creating. > > This is just silly. Google Groups ratings aren't creating any danger. Fallacy of division. > > At any rate, I have proposed that G refers to its 'reflection' or > > Goedel code, which I have called G' instead of t. > > That you have. You have also completely ignored all comments and > questions regarding your various baffling assertions about such matters. If I had, I wouldn't have responded to them. I even updated my essay based on one of your comments. |