Prev: data disapear
Next: monitor if computer is in idle
From: Ulrich Korndoerfer on 11 May 2010 13:59 Hi Karl, Karl E. Peterson schrieb: > ... > Well yeah, this guy I know is on the management board of the Big 8. :-) > ... Heckuva connection (I slowly get grasp of your wordings ;-) ) -- Ulrich Korndoerfer VB tips, helpers, solutions -> http://www.proSource.de/Downloads/
From: Ulrich Korndoerfer on 11 May 2010 14:05 Karl E. Peterson schrieb: > I bow to the marketing wizards at Coca-Cola on that usage. ... Yeah, I noticed that as soon as I firstly saw your new logo, using this decent color and font. :-) -- Ulrich Korndoerfer VB tips, helpers, solutions -> http://www.proSource.de/Downloads/
From: dpb on 11 May 2010 14:13 Karl E. Peterson wrote: > Ulrich Korndoerfer wrote: >> Following a cite of one of his posts regarding how he will proceed in >> the case of the MS shutdown: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.hierarchies/browse_thread/thread/67439c68236e7e35 >> > > Heckuva find! Gotta share this, and see what floats up... Indeed...most interesting in particular is the unofficial nature of the proposer of doing this. Most significant imo is response of Tim Skirvan noting the Big-8 could likely fast-track group creation in comp.* --
From: Ulrich Korndoerfer on 11 May 2010 14:19 PS >> I bow to the marketing wizards at Coca-Cola on that usage. ... > > Yeah, I noticed that as soon as I firstly saw your new logo, using this > decent color and font. :-) > And of course because you included that "Original formula" logo ;-) For non-americans: Coca-Cola had some issues (read: it did not sell) after they introduced a new kind of coke (AFAIR it was sweeter, because Pepsi's was sweeter), and soon reverted to the so advertised "original formula" version" :-) -- Ulrich Korndoerfer VB tips, helpers, solutions -> http://www.proSource.de/Downloads/
From: Mike Williams on 11 May 2010 14:37
"Ulrich Korndoerfer" <ulrich_wants_nospam(a)prosource.de> wrote in message news:uO8$0OT8KHA.1888(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Heckuva connection (I slowly get grasp of your wordings ;-) ) Sometimes we don't even get a grasp of our own wordings! Apparently all the main American and English dictionaries, including all the main online dictionaries, have copied an incorrect definition of the word siphon from the Oxford English Dictionary, in which it has been wrongly defined for about a hundred years and in which it is described as working by atmospheric pressure when in fact it does not do so. The mistake has only just been discovered! I thought the Americans always wanted to distance themselves from the British, but it seems they are only to willing to copy our word definitions, even when they are wrong! Aren't they a bunch of copy cats ;-) Mike |