From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <kchhq55r31q6f11qbhvd2vv3imf4pshp6n(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
><chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I bet Apple has a very good idea of how to maximize profits
>
>most companies do. otherwise they cease to exist.

You missed my point, idiot, which is that serving "typical usage
patterns" may conflict with their desire to maximize profits by
constraining their customers.

>> by constraining their customers in various ways.
>
>nonsense. if people felt constrained they would buy a different product.

Wrong again, idiot. People will buy the "best fit" product, *despite*
it's shortcomings. Just because "people like and will buy the iPad"
does not mean that USB ports would not improve it, idiot.

From: nospam on
In article <4d1iq55r1l3qpv8kncqvv22tgeiuipo3mp(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
<chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> >take an economics class sometime.
>
> I have, idiot. Take your own advice.

apparently you slept through it.

> Idiot. At issue was the keyboard, and your idiotic claim that "it's
> only overpriced if nobody buys it".

so how many have they sold?

> >and that different people have different needs.
>
> Evasion of my point noted.

it's not evasion at all. it's a fact. not everyone wants what you think
they should need. that's why there are a variety of devices available,
all with different feature sets.

> >that must be why the kindle has usb ports. oh wait, it doesn't.
>
> The Kindle is merely an e-reader, idiot, not the muli-function device
> that the iPad is.

but the kindle could do so much more, had amazon not crippled it.

of course, it's not apple who crippled it, so it's perfectly fine.

you're a hypocrite.
From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <slrnhqht5l.mm4.jedi(a)nomad.mishnet>, JEDIDIAH
><jedi(a)nomad.mishnet> wrote:
>
>> > the kindle doesn't have usb ports either. why aren't you slamming that?
>>
>> The kindle isn't being portrayed as anything more than a book reader.
>
>one of the main features of the ipad is ebooks, which is why there's
>apple's ibookstore, along with amazon and barnes&noble.

The point is that the Kindle is a narrow-focus device.

Idiot.

>> The Kindle also doesn't have an office suite planned for it.
>
>so amazon is constraining what you do with the kindle, but somehow it's
>perfectly acceptable.

Ye Gods, you are fscking *stupid*.

They are *two different product catagories*, you *idiot*. In only
*one* of these product catagories do things like USB ports become
really useful and expected!

> hypocrisy at its finest.

Stop lying, idiot.

From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <g81iq594d5tsk9gi86rkc5c97u8iiotdnf(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
><chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> >it's only a problem if people actually fill the storage they already
>> >have, which most don't. the best selling ipods have been the nanos
>> >which are currently 8-16 gig, not the ipod classic with 120-160 gig.
>>
>> Idiot. The point is, obviously, "removable" storage.
>
>the point is that if you don't fill the space you have, there's little
>need to have additional storage.

Idiot. Have you no idea of the usefulness of removable storage? You
are utterly without a clue.

>plus people don't want to fuss with a
>pocket full of cards.

Idiot. There is no requirement to "fuss with a packet full of cards"
to gain functionality and convenience through the use of removable
storage.

>ever wonder why the ipod sells so well when other players that have
>card slots don't?

I think I know the reasons, idiot, and none of them imply that the
iPod is an ideal piece of hardware.

> didn't think so.

No surprise you are again wrong, idiot.

From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <3a1iq5tli37o1dnrg82bthrad5odk0rfm1(a)4ax.com>, chrisv
><chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> USB ports would be a nice added feature, at extremely low cost.
>
>a lot of things would be nice to have, but they don't come for free.

Some things make sense to have, because they are quite useful and
afforable.

>and what exactly were you wanting to connect to it, anyway?

Storage, keyboard, camera, other possibilities.