No USB ports on Ipad!
in [Mac Systems]
|
From: gl4317 on 23 Mar 2010 01:00 In article <mtafq55elpvos9q2dbdb2flfjjitrq7u89(a)4ax.com>, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > If they were there, they'd get used, by many, and hardly a "waste". What type of USB device should it be? The master controller or the slave device? If it were a master, then it could have such things as cameras connected to it, but then the USB protocals wouldn't allow it to be connected to a computer, unless the computer had a slave controller in it. If it were a slave, then you would be able to connect it to a computer, but not to a camera. Unfortunately USB doesn't allow for any other type of device - it must be either a slave device or a master. So, if you are going to have a USB port, which type of device controller should it get? -- -Glennl Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam, and most e-mail sent to this address are simply lost in the vast mess.
From: Harry Mudd on 23 Mar 2010 05:01 On 3/20/2010 12:10 PM, OP wrote: > You need a Dock Connector-to-USB adapter . > > Buy one here for an additional $29 bucks. > > http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/apple-ipad-camera-connection-kit/ > > More Apple "innovation! > > Remember, Jobs doesn't like USB either. > > Why bother with USB? With USB 3.0 not due to be implemented in Intel chipsets until next year (2011), and Intel developing Light Peak, I think its probably a more prudent move for Apple to hold off a tad longer, and possibly go with a Light Peak interface for iPads requiring ultra high speed I/O bandwidth down the road. -- Harry
From: Peter Köhlmann on 23 Mar 2010 05:36 Harry Mudd wrote: > On 3/20/2010 12:10 PM, OP wrote: >> You need a Dock Connector-to-USB adapter . >> >> Buy one here for an additional $29 bucks. >> >> http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/apple-ipad-camera- connection-kit/ >> >> More Apple "innovation! >> >> Remember, Jobs doesn't like USB either. >> >> > > Why bother with USB? With USB 3.0 not due to be implemented in Intel > chipsets until next year (2011), and Intel developing Light Peak, I > think its probably a more prudent move for Apple to hold off a tad > longer, and possibly go with a Light Peak interface for iPads > requiring ultra high speed I/O bandwidth down the road. > What has USB3 to do with things? USB2 is plenty fast enough for toys like the iPad What the fanboiz don't want to admit is that apple deliberately chose to screw their customers by closing that thingy as much as possible. After all, their cargo cult members will defend every move of apple, no matter how much it will cost them down the road -- Modern man is the missing link between apes and human beings.
From: nospam on 23 Mar 2010 05:43 In article <hoa23k$ems$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > USB2 is plenty fast enough for toys like the iPad good thing it has usb 2 then. > What the fanboiz don't want to admit is that apple deliberately chose to > screw their customers by closing that thingy as much as possible. quite the opposite, actually. > After all, their cargo cult members will defend every move of apple, no > matter how much it will cost them down the road no, they just correct idiotic bullshit.
From: Peter Köhlmann on 23 Mar 2010 06:08
nospam wrote: > In article <hoa23k$ems$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter Köhlmann > <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > >> USB2 is plenty fast enough for toys like the iPad > > good thing it has usb 2 then. Actually, no, it does not You need an additional Connection Kit for that Just stop this outright lying, it just shows how desperate you fanboiz are >> What the fanboiz don't want to admit is that apple deliberately chose >> to screw their customers by closing that thingy as much as possible. > > quite the opposite, actually. Well, cargo cult members will never admit how much they like to be screwed >> After all, their cargo cult members will defend every move of apple, no >> matter how much it will cost them down the road > > no, they just correct idiotic bullshit. Since you chose to simply lie, there was not much left "corrected" -- Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice which can be equally well explained by stupidity |