From: nospam on
In article <Qv2qn.97571$K81.8505(a)newsfe18.iad>, Mocassin joe
<joemocasanto(a)aol.com> wrote:

> > look at apple's specs, where it very clearly states that it has usb:
>
> No, it doesn't "clearly state that it has usb". It doesn't state that
> anywhere. It's stupid to lie to further a spurious arguement.

apparently you cannot read.

> > <http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/>
> >
> > In the box
> > - iPad
> > - Dock Connector to USB Cable
> > - 10W USB Power Adapter
> >
> > Mac system requirements
> > - Mac computer with USB 2.0 port
> > Windows system requirements
> > - PC with USB 2.0 port
From: -hh on
nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote:
> > FWIW, I was very much intrigued by that "wireless USB" adaptor that
> > someone posted (in this thread?) recently.  Wish I could find the post
> > to get its name.
>
> <http://www.airstash.com/>


Ah, there it is. Thanks!



-hh
From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> Yet the sell an overpriced keyboard accessory.
>
>it's only overpriced if nobody buys it.

That is *not* the definition of "overpriced" you fscking *idiot".

You *seriously* think that if a product sells unit one, that it's not
"overpriced"? You don't think people ever cough-up the money for
"overpriced" products, especially when the available products that
meet their needs are artificially restricted?

Sheesh!

>> Clearly they think that there is some value in allowing their users
>> to have access to USB type devices to a very limited degree.
>
>some might want it, but not all will. that's why it's an accessory and
>not built in.

God damn,you are stupid. "Every single user will want to use this" is
*not* the criteria for including a feature. Face it, USB devices are
useful and ubiquitous.

Sheesh!

>> Of course they derive some benefit from directing you through their
>> own proprietary interface.
>
>you mean the standard ipod dock connector that's been around for 7
>years and for which there are zillions of third party devices
>available?

And Apple charges companies how much of a licensing fee to make
devices that connect to their proprietary interface?

From: Mocassin joe on

"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:230320100531373295%nospam(a)nospam.invalid...
> In article <Qv2qn.97571$K81.8505(a)newsfe18.iad>, Mocassin joe
> <joemocasanto(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> > look at apple's specs, where it very clearly states that it has usb:
>>
>> No, it doesn't "clearly state that it has usb". It doesn't state that
>> anywhere. It's stupid to lie to further a spurious arguement.
>
> apparently you cannot read.
>
>> > <http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/>
>> >
>> > In the box
>> > - iPad
>> > - Dock Connector to USB Cable
>> > - 10W USB Power Adapter
>> >
>> > Mac system requirements
>> > - Mac computer with USB 2.0 port
>> > Windows system requirements
>> > - PC with USB 2.0 port

By repeating yourself nothing changes. No USB port.


From: chrisv on
nospam wrote:

>In article <hoa7mf$ot4$12(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Chris Ahlstrom
><ahlstromc(a)launchmodem.com> wrote:
>
>> > Apple does. They've done this thing called "market research," with focus
>> > groups and surveys and stuff like that. You, on the other hand, have
>> > just your half-assed opinion.
>>
>> Where does Apple do all this "research"? Outside Apple stores?
>
>why does it matter where they do the research?

Because asking idiot fanbois like you skews the research, *obviously*.

Sheesh!