From: Peter Köhlmann on 23 Mar 2010 20:43 Fa-groon wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:42:44 -0700, hh wrote > (in article > <460c2323-dbc9-4ac9-b8d5-abde7308fa39(a)l25g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>): > >> chrisv <chr...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> nospam wrote: >>>> chrisv wrote: >>> >>>>> USB ports would be a nice added feature, at extremely low cost. >>> >>>> a lot of things would be nice to have, but they don't come for free. >>> >>> Some things make sense to have, because they are quite useful and >>> afforable. >>> >>>> and what exactly were you wanting to connect to it, anyway? >>> >>> Storage, keyboard, camera, other possibilities. >> >> >> USB is an implimentation, not a capability. >> >> Try making the distinction between having the *capability*, and how a >> capability is *implimented*. Then look again at the problem >> statement...you very well might not have a capability gap. >> >> >> -hh > > BTW, everything mentioned above: Storage, keyboard, camera, etc. can be > connected to an iPad. Just not directly. You need just another totally useless gadget, to get functionality anyone outside of the apple cargo cult would take for granted -- Try to be the best of whatever you are, even if what you are is no good.
From: nospam on 23 Mar 2010 20:47 In article <hobn7t$938$02$2(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > > BTW, everything mentioned above: Storage, keyboard, camera, etc. can be > > connected to an iPad. > > Just not directly. You need just another totally useless gadget, to get > functionality anyone outside of the apple cargo cult would take for > granted all of those can be connected without any adapter at all. it's this new technology called wireless.
From: Peter Köhlmann on 23 Mar 2010 20:50 nospam wrote: > In article <hobmga$80m$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter Köhlmann > <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > >> Translation: The iPad does not have a USB connector > > so it truly is magical. > > it connects to the usb port of a computer, yet it doesn't have a usb > connector! Are you Snit Michael Glasser? Or OxRetard? Only those could actually be stupid enough for this kind of bullshit What part of "the iPad does not have a USB connector" was too difficult for you? Any connectivity aquired by hooking the iPad to another device does not count as "the iPad having that capability". -- If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?
From: D.F. Manno on 23 Mar 2010 20:54 In article <hobgg2$l1v$00$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > They had *lots* of problems with apple simply pulling their > apps nilly willy for no good reason. Apple is not required to run ads, so pulling them is entirely within its rights as long as they honor existing contracts. -- D.F. Manno dfmanno(a)mail.com "Quid lucrum istic mihi est?"
From: nospam on 23 Mar 2010 20:56
In article <hobnle$4if$00$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > What part of "the iPad does not have a USB connector" was too difficult > for you? what part of it comes with a usb cable and plugs into a usb port on a computer is too difficult for you? no, you can't plug a hard drive or a printer into it. so what? that's not how it's intended to be used. you can't plug a hard drive or printer into a kindle either, but of course, there's no issue there because it's not filthy apple. you are as transparent as the glass on the front of the ipad. |