From: zoara on 6 May 2010 18:49 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > > > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Its not far out - it is about 3cm on the iPhone and 4cm of screen > > > on > > > the > > > nokia. > > > > Crikey. In that case I'm astonished by those photos. > > I will do some photos with a tape measure too, just to check it is the > same I'd be interested, but not enough for you to go to any great trouble. > > > > The iPhone does have a more > > > > noticeable pixel grid, which I can make out in normal use > > > > sometimes. > > > > The > > > > N810 seems - from your photos - not to have such a visible grid. > > > > > > It doesn't. With my eyes I can't actually see the grid on the > > > nokia > > > and > > > can on the iPhone. It is actually less noticable than you would > > > think > > > due to better icon design on the iPhone, but it would be nice if > > > they > > > upped it a bit. > > > > Aye. Roll on the rumoured hi-res iPhone display. The iPhone has > > always > > had a decent screen, but when compared to other kit (like your N810) > > the > > shortcomings show up. At least the iPhone's touch detection is more > > accurate than average - don't think I could type so much if it was a > > bit > > fuzzy. But a hires screen like the N810's could help with reading... > > Small black text on white in particular always looks a bit fuzzed > > out > > and dirty... > > Roll on resolution independance! > > See, it is one of those 'nice to have' things. The nokia / htc etc > fanbois would rave about that being a major issue against the iPhone, > but the fact is I went from the nokia to the iPhone and never noticed > it, until I took those pictures. I notice it, but only when someone hands me a device with a denser screen. When I'm actually just using my iPhone it doesn't really bother me, but when I compare text side by side the iPhone can look pretty poor. Pictures are often a different matter... maybe the Nexus One I got to fondle was a dud but the colours seemed a bit garish - like someone had ramped up the contrast on all the photos. > The nokia has a great screen, and a passive digitiser that works with > a > cursor or a finger (it decides which depending on.. umm.. supposed to > be > the pressure, but I think it may just be the weather or something) and > compared to the iPhone, it really seems very inaccurate, especially at > the edges of the screen. Yeah, if I had to pick one, I'd much rather have an incredibly accurate touch screen than a very high resolution one. Did you see those digitiser tests they did? The Motorola Droid looked like someone was trying to draw straight lines while cycling down a cobbled street (the iPhone's lines were dead straight except for a slight curve at the edges). > I do like the nokia as a small computer, but as a thiing for 'normal > people' it really doesn't make it. Apple do seem to be better at concentrating on the features that are useful, rather than those that look good on a spec sheet. I've got to say, at one point I was tempted by an N800 series, but now, not so much... -z- -- email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: Movado Classic Museum Black Mens Watch 0605649 Next: Adobe CS 5 |