From: Chris H on 29 Jan 2010 15:38 In message <q6f6m5h08qm8b3vc4ku4lfsr2jijcg1k2a(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> writes >On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:43:37 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> >wrote: > >>>>Which military were you in? >>>U.S. Army. PIO. >> >>Ok. That is colouring your perception. In the US army (as in the Soviet >>and Chinese ) only the Officers have information. It is not the case in >>other militaries. > >There is information, and there is information. Yes >>As to the original point of US and the Law... >> >>Detention with out trial >>Detention without access to legal representation >>Detention without charges >>Kidnapping >>Torture >>Killing of civilians without warning > >This you saw in California? No. > Your trip to California was your stated >base of knowledge for your claims about US law. No it was not > Guantanamo is not in >California. But it is an example of how the US legal system works. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Savageduck on 29 Jan 2010 16:08 On 2010-01-29 12:38:47 -0800, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> said: > In message <q6f6m5h08qm8b3vc4ku4lfsr2jijcg1k2a(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper > <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> writes >> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:43:37 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> >> wrote: >> >>>>> Which military were you in? >>>> U.S. Army. PIO. >>> >>> Ok. That is colouring your perception. In the US army (as in the Soviet >>> and Chinese ) only the Officers have information. It is not the case in >>> other militaries. >> >> There is information, and there is information. > > Yes > >>> As to the original point of US and the Law... >>> >>> Detention with out trial >>> Detention without access to legal representation >>> Detention without charges >>> Kidnapping >>> Torture >>> Killing of civilians without warning >> >> This you saw in California? > No. I wouldn't have thought so. > >> Your trip to California was your stated >> base of knowledge for your claims about US law. > > No it was not I thought California was where you experienced all those dangerous cities, "up and down California." > >> Guantanamo is not in >> California. > But it is an example of how the US legal system works. Wrong, on so many levels. Again, what you claimed was "personal experience" with the US Legal System. So far your "personal experience" appears to be what you have read, seen on TV, or heard in the pub. You have given us no evidence of this "personal experience" at all. Care to try again and be less evasive this time. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: tony cooper on 29 Jan 2010 17:06 On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:38:47 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >In message <q6f6m5h08qm8b3vc4ku4lfsr2jijcg1k2a(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper ><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> writes >>On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:43:37 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> >>wrote: >> >>>>>Which military were you in? >>>>U.S. Army. PIO. >>> >>>Ok. That is colouring your perception. In the US army (as in the Soviet >>>and Chinese ) only the Officers have information. It is not the case in >>>other militaries. >> >>There is information, and there is information. > >Yes > >>>As to the original point of US and the Law... >>> >>>Detention with out trial >>>Detention without access to legal representation >>>Detention without charges >>>Kidnapping >>>Torture >>>Killing of civilians without warning >> >>This you saw in California? >No. > >> Your trip to California was your stated >>base of knowledge for your claims about US law. > >No it was not The problem with reversing your story in a newsgroup is that your previous posts remain available. In this case in answer to: >You appear to be totally ignorant of the US Legal system, and you are >basing your opinion on that ignorance. You said: >Not at all... seen it in action first hand. (And I don't mean on TV) You later added that you had made trips up and down California. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Peter on 29 Jan 2010 19:22 "Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:+hRZOVHzKyYLFADj(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk... > In message <4b620c8b$0$31163$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, Peter > <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> writes >> >>Notice in the microstock price war thread, he is now complaining about >>how amateur photographers screw things up for the professionals. > > And your point is? Professional Photographer Magazine was saying the > same thing this month. > Your lack of attribution, when your statement purports to be original clearly bears on your credibility. BTW why don't you specify exactly what bearing your experiences in California have on your knowledge of our legal system? -- Peter
From: Twibil on 29 Jan 2010 22:31
On Jan 29, 12:38 pm, Chris H <ch...(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: > > > > Guantanamo is not in > >California. > > But it is an example of how the US legal system works. Ya see, this is the sort of statement that clearly tells Americans that you *don't* have any relevant experience with the US legal system. Otherwise you'd know how silly you sound. |