From: Chris H on
In message <4b5f44da$2$30279$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, Peter
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> writes
>"Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:3BMbW2C5bzXLFAIm@p
>haedsys.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <4b5f3101$0$30984$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, Peter
>> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> writes
>>>"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
>>>news:2010012609305579149-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
>>>
>>>> Bush, Cheny, Wolfowitz, and Blair are criminally responsible for
>>>>leading the US & UK into that war in the face of all the reasons not
>>>>to.
>>>>
>>>> Afghanistan is a different issue. The failure of the Taliban
>>>>government to surrender the Al Qaeda 9/11 plotters led to the initial
>>>>NATO supported action there.
>>>> The problem there has been the support of the corrupt Karzai regime,
>>>>and the spectre of a Taliban led government take over in Pakistan.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Gotta partially differ on Afghanistan. The Taliban's refusal to
>>>surrender any plotters is entirely consistent with the Afghani
>>>tradition of hospitality and safe haven. These are highly cherished
>>>customs that have their root in Koran. There are work arounds, but the
>>>Bush administration was too blind to see them. Cheney had no intention
>>>of using those workarounds, even if they were recognized. Our
>>>disregard of their ways is a large source of the resentment against us.
>>>However, bringing that up is about as useful now as arguing that the UK
>>>was the biggest agitator in starting WWI. Now that we are involved, I
>>>see the problem as how to disengage while maintaining our security.
>>
>> The Afghan government even offered to hand over OBL if the US could show
>> any evidence... they could not and probably still can't
>>
>
>
>You claim to have a security background and make a statement like that?
>1. OBL made the requisite admission.

For every murder there are usually half a dozen confessions (including
from James Dean and Elvis) You clearly do not understand Al-Qeada and
how it "works" from that one statement above that you make it is clear
you are have no involvement to understanding with counter terrorisum and
Al-qeada. you seem to be repeating propaganda.

>2. In order to present the evidence we would have to divulge all
>operatives. Yup! I'm sure you would like us to do that.

Not at all. However this is a common excuse from the USA. Most of the
world now assume the US is lying when it says that as it has been caught
out many times before.


--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Chris H on
In message <03eul51qo44qok88rt8b1hliklg9k7l3m5(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper
<tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> writes
>On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:05:06 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org>
>wrote:
>
>>>Yeah, right. We're supposed to believe that the opinion of some
>>>low-level non-combatant can speak for the professional military.
>>
>>So where do you get that information from?
>
>Don't weasel. Were you, or were you not, a ranking officer at command
>level

Now you really show you don't understand

>with access to information about how the UK military command
>rate the US military?

Yes.

> Were you, or were you not, actively involved in
>a combate role?

Yes,

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Peter on
"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:12hvl5lsfbdpdrsh0hck5s3efafjocc17g(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:47:55 -0800, C J Campbell
> <christophercampbellremovethis(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Note, of course, that this part applies ONLY to Aircraft where the
>>Passengers are required to be SCREENED. Obviously, Passengers in
>>PRIVATE Aircraft can and do carry Firearms. Apparently TSA believes
>>that it would be a highly unusual Moose Hunter who would hijack himself.
>
> Wasn't that long ago that a moose hunter tried to hijack the country.


Now she's trying to milk it.

Scary thing is her standing in the polls, if she tried to run. Hope she
stays with faux noise.

--
Peter

From: Chris H on
In message <4b604723$0$31140$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, Peter
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> writes
>"Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:tCgtWNP2fDYLFAyw@p
>haedsys.demon.co.uk...
>>>"Most of the world" = an expression right out of the populist left wing
>>>blogs.
>>
>> SO we know what your bias is...
>
>True I am not a left wing nut, nor a right wing nut either.

No, you just sound like one,.

>> I am right of centre and have a military background. And been to the ME.
>What did you do there, clean the latrines?

No.

>> Where were you when you were last in the Middle East? Or are you just
>> chattering about what you saw on TV?
>>
>Irrelevant question.

That is a good way of avoiding the question

> More important is the ability to analyze facts, objectively.(A skill
>you seem to lack.)

Time to start showing it them you seem to be keeping it well hidden so
far.

>BTW I was there more times than you have been in Kurdistan.

Really? Any times dates places?
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From: Peter on
"Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message
news:dykhaISl+EYLFAn8(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk...
> In message <4b604723$0$31140$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, Peter
> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> writes
>>"Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message news:tCgtWNP2fDYLFAyw@p
>>haedsys.demon.co.uk...
>>>>"Most of the world" = an expression right out of the populist left wing
>>>>blogs.
>>>
>>> SO we know what your bias is...
>>
>>True I am not a left wing nut, nor a right wing nut either.
>
> No, you just sound like one,.

Commng from you!

Bwahahahaha

>
>>> I am right of centre and have a military background. And been to the ME.
>>What did you do there, clean the latrines?
>
> No.
>
>>> Where were you when you were last in the Middle East? Or are you just
>>> chattering about what you saw on TV?
>>>
>>Irrelevant question.
>
> That is a good way of avoiding the question
>

I leared it from you

>> More important is the ability to analyze facts, objectively.(A skill
>>you seem to lack.)
>
> Time to start showing it them you seem to be keeping it well hidden so
> far.
>
>>BTW I was there more times than you have been in Kurdistan.
>
> Really? Any times dates places?

Since you have obviated any intelligent discussion, avoided answering
questions and descended into name calling, my participation in this with you
is discontinued.



--
Peter