From: slider on

tom, who blindly sees only himself in everyone else, wrote... :)

"you turn on your computer to rant incoherently about how bad everybody else is.
And then you have the audacity to prance around pretending you're superior." --tom

### - duh, talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!

tom you've just completely nailed yourself in one (roaring LOLs)

i.e. you 'act' as if intelligent only it's all a sham, which makes you just
another blind man attempting to lead the blind...

i rest my case ;-)



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: slider on

HG (tom in disguise?) wrote...

>> See, you don't care about the world or other people, you won't even consider
>> to humble yourself and feel the pain of the world.
>
>
> Of *course* I have considered it. I have considered it, and found it to be a
> very stupid and worthless idea.

### - that's only because like many badly educated people you're so completely
'selfish' and 'self-absorbed' that you're practically incapable of seeing beyond
the boundaries of your own being in order to be able to accurately see the rest of
the world... this being something which your own words reveal to just about
anyone with even a 'modicum' of genuine honest intelligence... iow, you're just
another poser with a megaphone and you can't even see it...

oh, and did i mention nauseatingly pompous to-boot? ;-)




--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: HG on
"slider" <slider(a)anashram.com> writes:

> HG (tom in disguise?) wrote...


Oh look, another loser who thinks someone is Tom's sock puppet if they agree
with him.

Oh well, at least you had the common sense to include the weaseling question
mark, unlike so many others.


> >> See, you don't care about the world or other people, you won't even
> >> consider to humble yourself and feel the pain of the world.
> >
> >
> > Of *course* I have considered it. I have considered it, and found it to
> > be a very stupid and worthless idea.
>
> ### - that's only because like many badly educated people


So you consider someone with half an engineering degree plus a completed
master's degree in music to be "badly educated"?

OK, that's your definition. What's your education level? Three PhD's and a
Nobel Prize?


Or did you mean instead that I'm "badly educated" because I disagree with
you and your pal?


> you're so completely 'selfish' and 'self-absorbed' that you're practically
> incapable of seeing beyond the boundaries of your own being in order to be
> able to accurately see the rest of the world...


So much for "accurately see the rest of the world", Mr. "you're Tom's sock
puppet and badly educated."


> this being something which your own words reveal to just about anyone with
> even a 'modicum' of genuine honest intelligence... iow, you're just another
> poser with a megaphone and you can't even see it...


Now you're just looking into a mirror and thinking it's me.

Really, what do you actually know about me? I wrote something you didn't
like, and presto - your imagination kicks into overdrive, and you start
inventing stories after fabricated stories about me.


> oh, and did i mention nauseatingly pompous to-boot? ;-)


Unlike the model of humility and restraint that is you, Mr. "I know all about
you after reading a few paragraphs of what you wrote."


HG
From: Tom on
On Mar 6, 1:16 pm, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote:
>
> oh, and did i mention i'm nauseatingly pompous to-boot?  ;-)

It was obvious.

From: Tom on
On Mar 6, 1:06 pm, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote:
> tom, who blindly sees only himself in everyone else, wrote...  :)
>
> "you turn on your computer to rant incoherently about how bad everybody else is.
> And then you have the audacity to prance around pretending you're superior." --tom
>
> ### - duh, talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!

But since I am not the one damning the human race to extinction for
its sins, I'm not setting myself up as its judge. That's your
audacious prancing. It would be humble to express concern for the
possible results of human folly, but it is decidedly not humble to
declare them doomed because they've sinned against whatever it is you
consider to be "the rules of nature". You say people would survive
if only they'd "wake up" and start acting the way you want them to
act. The only reason you can think of as to why they act differently
from you are that they are not "awake", whereas *you* are. The
serious possibility that you have completely misread the world
situation and that it's nowhere near as simplistic as you think it is
has not even occurred to you. Nope, all you have to say is that if
people don't act the way you think they should, they all deserve to
die.

That is the very epitome of a self-righteous belief in your own
superiority. You can play "I'm rubber and you're glue" all you want,
but it changes nothing. The fact remains that you're prancing around
pretending to be superior.