Poof !
in [Physics]
|
Prev: ARCTIC OCEAN WARMING, ICEBERGS GROWING SCARCE, WASHINGTON POSTREPORTS [33 scary quotes since 1870]
Next: From Where the WTC Idiocy Starts - Hank the Fired Janitor
From: slider on 7 Mar 2010 06:31 HG writes... >> I don't pronounce death penalty on the humans, they do it themselves by >> living the way they live. > > > Now you sound like a rapist defending himself: "She was asking for it. > They're *all* asking for it!" ### - lol hg, what an idiotic analogy, your ignorance is truly amazing! or perhaps you think that the 'world' was 'asking for it' too LOL :) but i think everyone deserves at least one chance so i'll give you a clue just to see what (if anything) you can make of it ok? let's see just how smart you 'really' are... i.e. it's definitely not the 'chimpanzees' that have been carelessly damaging the planet you know... get it yet pal? (sheesh ;-) --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: slider on 8 Mar 2010 04:31 tom replies... > "you turn on your computer to rant incoherently about how bad everybody else is. > And then you have the audacity to prance around pretending you're > superior." --tom > > ### - duh, talk about the pot calling the kettle black!! But since I am not the one damning the human race to extinction for its sins, I'm not setting myself up as its judge. That's your audacious prancing. It would be humble to express concern for the possible results of human folly, but it is decidedly not humble to declare them doomed because they've sinned against whatever it is you consider to be "the rules of nature". ### - back-up a bit tom, because i 'was' in fact expressing my concerns for the 'likely' results of our human 'stupidity' (folly is too apologetic a description as far as i'm concerned) and wilful blindness, the way i went about doing so being just my way of expressing it, which incidentally also included humour, self-deprecation, plus even an Einstein quote (which everyone deliberately ignored in-favour of their own interpretation) along the 'exact' same lines/observation in order to qualify it as not 'just' being the ravings of some malcontent, and one could never accuse uncle albert of that) so what i suggest i that you read it again, only 'this time' please leave 'yourself' out of it and then perhaps a little clarity on your part will be gained instead of the pile of personalised tripe you've been trotting-out so far under the heading of intelligent comments in this regard... You say people would survive if only they'd "wake up" and start acting the way you want them to act. The only reason you can think of as to why they act differently from you are that they are not "awake", whereas *you* are. ### - don't you read properly? i never said they'd 'survive', i only said they could at least do something about for 'themselves' and that in order to be 'able' to do that one perforce has to be 'awake' to what's really going down on this lovely little blue and green planet of ours that we're ruining because we choose denial (exactly as you are currently doing and defending) and 'not' to be awake to the rather obvious consequences of our actions... The serious possibility that you have completely misread the world situation and that it's nowhere near as simplistic as you think it is has not even occurred to you. Nope, all you have to say is that if people don't act the way you think they should, they all deserve to die. ### - of course it's occurred to me, years ago in fact... the 'simple' answer of course being that humans are directly responsible, what's suspicious being those who would rather 'complicate' everything to the nth degree merely so they can 'delay' actually doing something about, something i would contend is the direct result of living in such denial in the first place! :) That is the very epitome of a self-righteous belief in your own superiority. You can play "I'm rubber and you're glue" all you want, but it changes nothing. The fact remains that you're prancing around pretending to be superior. ### - 'observers/reporters' make comments from a completely 'non-personal' pov else they be accused of having some sort of personal vested interest in the possible outcome, and seeing as we've more than likely already fucked it all up there's no personal interest 'left' to foster... this being something you don't seem to grasp precisely because you in fact still 'do' have such a vested interest, else why rise to the defence of the indefensible instead of outright condemning it? (big question huh :) ----------------- "We are becoming a nation of men and women who, in their quest for happiness, all too often fall short of achieving any kind of inner peace.We think that by always reaching higher, accomplishing more --more money, a better body, the perfect mate- that we will automatically be happy. That's an illusion. All this reaching is making us crazy. We need to rest." --Melvyn Kinder --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: slider on 8 Mar 2010 07:36 Tom declares... You want everyone in the world to act a certain way and you are so angry that they are not doing what you want that you are quitely literally hoping they'll all die, even if that means you'll die too. That sort of attitude is what leads people to shoot up schools and malls until the police finally put them out of their misery. You're not presenting a rational argument, just venting an enraged scream. ### - projecting yourself again onto others tom? i must say it's all very revealing about you and the way you see things 'coz that's not at 'all' what HE was saying/suggesting ;-) e.g. you just stated... "It's just blind hatred and frustration over not getting your own way. You're not presenting a rational argument, just venting an enraged scream." --tom well i'm tellin' ya that's definitely not 'him', so make a wild guess as to whom that leaves :) --------------------- "It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well." --Rene Descartes, 1637 --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Tom on 8 Mar 2010 10:54 On Mar 8, 4:36 am, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote: > > ### - projecting yourself again onto others tom? Still sticking to ther "I'm rubber, you're glue" tactic, eh?
From: Tom on 8 Mar 2010 10:56
On Mar 8, 10:17 am, "Akhet" <h...(a)home.earth> wrote: > > I'm done in this thread ! Oh, good. |