Privacy Wipe Apps ?
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: u-tube
Next: "Progress" [was: Scanner driver]
From: whome? on 14 Jan 2010 08:48 On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:18:04 +0000, hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: >'whome?' wrote thus: > >>On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:56:29 -0500, JB <none(a)server.null> wrote: >> >>>whome? wrote: >>> >>>> Who said you could use the web anonymously? If you use Tor or >>>> whatever, there is an IP address at each end. There is no such thing >>>> as anonynous web usage. >>> >>>Wrong. >>> >>>Tor does indeed provide hard anonymity. >>> >>>That anonymity comes from it being mathematically unfeasible for >>>*anyone* to collate an IP on one side of the Tor network with an IP >>>on the other. Yes, both are visible to casual observers, but it's >>>impossible to know that the IP on the exit side of Tor is being >>>used by any given user at their IP address on the entry side. >>>Multiple layers of strong, public key encryption see to that. >> >>Man, you are stubborn. The Tor server has an IP. Your ISP logs your >>IP and the Tor IP. Once your packets hit the tor server, the >>encryption is removed, and the packets continue to your desired web >>site. The Tor server has an ISP like you and I do. The Tor ISP logs >>all its traffic, including the Tor exit packets. The only thing Tor >>does is make your traffic BLIND to your ISP only. Any cop can unmask >>you with minimal effort, especially in the UK. Tor is not worth the >>time. > >Where's the feed-in to LE in this? IE what triggers them to >believe a crime has been committed and they should go to a >Tor exit node's ISP and start investigating? What is LE? How about back tracking - From some web site, back to Tor site, back to you? The cops may not be investigating you, but some web site and they want to know who visits the web site. Pornography, money laundering, and many other web useages are plenty of reasons to backtrack to unmask site users.
From: za kAT on 14 Jan 2010 10:18 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:41:55 +0000, hummingbird wrote: > fyi: SOCA = Serious Organised Crime Agency - a sort of > British equivalent of the FBI and they share close contacts. How's it going then? Are they taking you seriously? I hope so, because you're going to get a huge bill, and more, for wasting their time. -- za kAT
From: za kAT on 14 Jan 2010 13:02 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:38:12 +0000, hummingbird wrote: > 'za kAT' wrote thus: > >>On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:41:55 +0000, hummingbird wrote: >> >>> fyi: SOCA = Serious Organised Crime Agency - a sort of >>> British equivalent of the FBI and they share close contacts. >> >>How's it going then? > > I'm just fine thanks...looking forward to the beach soon... :-) > LOL. I'm not sure why you find that funny? but I'm glad that you have finally found a new job. >>Are they taking you seriously? > > What on earth are you blathering about, Stubbo? > Is this another one of your delusions? I was talking about Bodie and Doyle, I thought you said you had contacts in LE who were going to rain fire and brimstone down upon Pricelessware. > I was as surprised by that access as you might have been. > I still don't know what it means... Oh, you think I bothered to follow one of your links. Sorry, but I've given you so many clues to my IP, it wouldn't be good for your character development, to just hand it to you on a plate. >>I hope so, because >>you're going to get a huge bill, and more, for wasting their time. > > Since I had nothing to do with what they do, I doubt that very > much. I hope you have a rich daddy. > But please continue to delude yerself if it makes you happy > and takes (what's left of) your mind off your life of failures... I weep all the way to the bank... -- za kAT
From: za kAT on 14 Jan 2010 13:13 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:44:49 +0000, hummingbird wrote: > <sigh> when people use LOL etc on the Internet, they are not > always laughing at what they have written but trying to convey > the lighthearted mindset they were in when they wrote it. Ah, have you've been smokin'? I would, if I was you. The stress of being made a fool of, on a daily basis, must be aging you prematurely. -- za kAT
From: Sam Luter on 14 Jan 2010 14:48
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:02:09 +0000, za kAT wrote: > I weep all the way to the bank... i own the bank |