Prev: curanzia versicherung, berufsunfähigkeits versicherung, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung für selbständige, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
Next: Why only 4.6MP?
From: ray on 23 Feb 2010 20:18 On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:57:56 -0500, J. Clarke wrote: > On 2/23/2010 5:00 PM, ray wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:45:42 -0500, nospam wrote: >> >>> In article<7uj0d4Fb4lU11(a)mid.individual.net>, ray<ray(a)zianet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Great - I'll remember that what you say doesn't mean what you say. >>> >>> and i'll remember that you don't understand english. >> >> I understand quite well, and I generally expect people to say what they >> mean. > > If you don't grasp idiomatic usage then either you don't understand > English as well as you think you do or you have something wrong with > you. Ah, I see you don't expect folks to say what they mean either. I idiot had said the PS has more support than GIMP, I would not have argued. When he SAID GIMP had none - he was wrong.
From: nospam on 23 Feb 2010 20:33 In article <7ujcunFb4lU14(a)mid.individual.net>, ray <ray(a)zianet.com> wrote: > Nonsense. I've not done that at all. I've suggested to a neophyte that he > check out the free alternatives before blowing a wad of money. GIMP and > ufraw may or may not meet his needs better than PS - they would certainly > be cheaper and it's his decision to make. what wad of money? photoshop elements has a free trial, and it's around $50 if he likes it. and from the sounds of what he described, lightroom or aperture might be a better choice.
From: John McWilliams on 23 Feb 2010 20:56 John A. wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:12:16 +0100, Robert Spanjaard > <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:32:21 -0500, John A. wrote: >> >>>> Doesn't Windows have some kind of escape character to use spaces (and >>>> other special characters) in filenames? >>> Not that I can see. >> What happens when you put double quotes around the executable? >> Something like this: >> >> "C:\Program Files\DigiKam\DigiKam.exe" [filename] > > Yeah, that's the "quote trick" I mentioned before. > >> That's the only other solution I can think of. If that doesn't work, you >> can still switch to a KDE-based Linux distro. :-) > > Nah. Too much other stuff to replace if I did that. :) > > Maybe some day. I'd love to get our business computers switched so we > can break out of the Windows continuum. 2000's getting a little long > in the tooth and everything since is unappetizing. That's easy enough to do, but it takes more money. -- john mcwilliams
From: J. Clarke on 23 Feb 2010 21:56 On 2/23/2010 8:18 PM, ray wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:57:56 -0500, J. Clarke wrote: > >> On 2/23/2010 5:00 PM, ray wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:45:42 -0500, nospam wrote: >>> >>>> In article<7uj0d4Fb4lU11(a)mid.individual.net>, ray<ray(a)zianet.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Great - I'll remember that what you say doesn't mean what you say. >>>> >>>> and i'll remember that you don't understand english. >>> >>> I understand quite well, and I generally expect people to say what they >>> mean. >> >> If you don't grasp idiomatic usage then either you don't understand >> English as well as you think you do or you have something wrong with >> you. > > Ah, I see you don't expect folks to say what they mean either. I idiot > had said the PS has more support than GIMP, I would not have argued. When > he SAID GIMP had none - he was wrong. Can you say "Asperger's syndrome"?
From: ray on 23 Feb 2010 23:57
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:33:51 -0500, nospam wrote: > In article <7ujcunFb4lU14(a)mid.individual.net>, ray <ray(a)zianet.com> > wrote: > >> Nonsense. I've not done that at all. I've suggested to a neophyte that >> he check out the free alternatives before blowing a wad of money. GIMP >> and ufraw may or may not meet his needs better than PS - they would >> certainly be cheaper and it's his decision to make. > > what wad of money? photoshop elements has a free trial, and it's around > $50 if he likes it. Great. What's even better than "$50 if he likes it"? How about FREE if he likes it. > > and from the sounds of what he described, lightroom or aperture might be > a better choice. |