Processing Program
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: curanzia versicherung, berufsunfähigkeits versicherung, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung für selbständige, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
Next: Why only 4.6MP?
From: nospam on 23 Feb 2010 23:58 In article <7ujpt3Fb4lU17(a)mid.individual.net>, ray <ray(a)zianet.com> wrote: > Great. What's even better than "$50 if he likes it"? How about FREE if he > likes it. some things aren't worth free.
From: Chris H on 24 Feb 2010 02:54 In message <17c7b$4b846055$546accd9$3067(a)cache70.multikabel.net>, Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> writes >On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:53:37 +0000, Chris H wrote: > >>>> Based on the discussion so far, I feel that something like GIMP may >>>> not be good for me, based on my needs and the lack of support. But I >>>> thank everyone who recommended it anyway. I don't mind spending a few >>>> dollars, although Photoshop CS3 or 4 IS a bit much right now. >>>> >>>> Hope this clarifies a bit. >>> >>>Certainly. >>> >>>In which way do you find support for GIMP lacking? >> >> The video tutorials on the web and on cover CD's of most photo magazines >> were a bit light (non-existent), > >http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gimp+tutorial+video > >> the books on GIMP are hard to find on amazon (or in any book shop), > >http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field- >keywords=gimp&x=0&y=0 > >> If I ask in any photo forum no one has >> ever heard of GIMP and refer me to Pulp Fiction..... :-) > >Must be a great forum. Forums (plural). This is the only place I see anyone talking about GIMP. In the local photo clubs, all the photo magazines and other forums it is never mentioned. This is probably because no pro or serious amateur uses it. All I can see is religion from you. You are pushing an app that is not as good in performance, lousy interface, not as well supported and with only a few users over an industry standard. You see the same sort of irrational arguments from the Open Source brigade. The Devotees chant the mantra's and accusing everyone else of having the myopia they suffer from. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Chris H on 24 Feb 2010 03:01 In message <230220101806139479%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes >In article <7VBYD1IX3FhLFAY1(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk>, Chris H ><chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: > >> >the fact that he uses iphoto means he uses a mac. >> >> Probably :-) It is best to ask... I have stopped taking these things >> for granted. > >iphoto and aperture are mac only so there isn't any other option. Last time I looked Aperture was only on MAC (as was iPhoto) but these things have a habit of changing when I am not looking :-) I must admit I only tried GIMP on the PC... PS and both Mac and PC. It was also partly why I chose Lightroom over Aperture. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Better Info on 24 Feb 2010 03:20 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:59:14 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >There are plug ins, actions, scripts etc etc No different than all the other more advanced editors. Some of them having even simpler methods and more advanced script programming methods. Even "lowly and ancient" Paint Shop Pro v9.01 has all that available. But they don't require 10,000,000 blind and lost followers trying to explain it to each other, and how to use it. Keep on trolling, it's fun watching you display how very little you know.
From: Better Info on 24 Feb 2010 03:22
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:05:45 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: > >In this instance PSE is a better choice than GIMP. Only the religious >would say otherwise. Funny, that sounds exactly like the desperate cries of the religiously insecure. No wait. It doesn't sound exactly like it, IT IS. |