Processing Program
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: curanzia versicherung, berufsunfähigkeits versicherung, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung für selbständige, berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung preis, versicherung vergleich,
Next: Why only 4.6MP?
From: Chris H on 23 Feb 2010 17:48 In message <2010022312574264440-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> writes > >Again, my recommendation is Elements + Lightroom, and Photomatix Pro for HDR. >As you have noted, upgrading is part of the process. I agree if the OP is finding iPhoto restrictive. Lightroom would be better. Then get hold of Elements. >> Could I manage either of those programs in a learning curve? > >Yes. Easily. Likewise. Watch the videos for Lightroom and compare them with the videos for GIMP :-) -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Chris H on 23 Feb 2010 17:51 In message <b4k8o5h9u83hu4129ra9tlf1kdttuq6g6m(a)4ax.com>, tony cooper <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> writes >On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:39:26 -0500, Alan Lichtenstein <arl(a)erols.com> > >If, by "asset management", you mean a system that allows you to tag or >keyword images by subject, then Elements has that system in the >"Organizer" module. Lightroom has a much better system for this, but >you really don't need this unless you are working with a library of >over a thousand or more images. With only a few hundred photos, you >can "asset manage" with a file folder system. Trouble is with digital it is amazing how fast you gain pictures... I outgrew iPhoto in months. >I've tried Gimp, just to see what it does, but I had the advantage of >being an experienced Photoshop user and could figure things out from >that knowledge. I would never recommend a newbie start with Gimp. Also my experience. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: J. Clarke on 23 Feb 2010 17:57 On 2/23/2010 5:00 PM, ray wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:45:42 -0500, nospam wrote: > >> In article<7uj0d4Fb4lU11(a)mid.individual.net>, ray<ray(a)zianet.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Great - I'll remember that what you say doesn't mean what you say. >> >> and i'll remember that you don't understand english. > > I understand quite well, and I generally expect people to say what they > mean. If you don't grasp idiomatic usage then either you don't understand English as well as you think you do or you have something wrong with you.
From: Robert Spanjaard on 23 Feb 2010 18:01 On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:44:56 +0000, Chris H wrote: >>You would not recommend, lightroom or aperture? They're a bit more >>expensive, but is it worth the difference at this point? > > Try them and see. There are 30 day eval versions of both. BEFORE you > download watch the demo videos for both. Both have multiple videos. And when you're trying out software anyway... -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Chris H on 23 Feb 2010 17:53
In message <82f59$4b843a35$546accd9$23370(a)cache80.multikabel.net>, Robert Spanjaard <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> writes >On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:46:27 -0500, Alan Lichtenstein wrote: > >[...] >> Based on the discussion so far, I feel that something like GIMP may not >> be good for me, based on my needs and the lack of support. But I thank >> everyone who recommended it anyway. I don't mind spending a few >> dollars, although Photoshop CS3 or 4 IS a bit much right now. >> >> Hope this clarifies a bit. > >Certainly. > >In which way do you find support for GIMP lacking? The video tutorials on the web and on cover CD's of most photo magazines were a bit light (non-existent), the books on GIMP are hard to find on amazon (or in any book shop), If I ask in any photo forum no one has ever heard of GIMP and refer me to Pulp Fiction..... :-) -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |