From: nospam on
In article <mh1eq5lmqo60gtpgqs68fco4ik1l25ed1l(a)isp5.newshosting.com>,
-= Hawk =- <Hawk(a)SPAMcfl.SUCKSrr.com> wrote:

> I've used Macs for professional editing at the TV station I worked at. I
> wasn't that impressed. Thing crashed and locked up as much, if not more
> than, as a Windows machine.

whenever i see these claims, nobody ever mentions *what* software was
being used, which mac, which version of the operating system, etc.

apparently, if one or two macs crash, they're all junk.

> Now that they're Intel based they're even
> less impressive and more overpriced than ever.

actually they're more competitive than ever.

but why let facts ruin a good troll.
From: Aatu Koskensilta on
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes:

> whenever someone resorts to ad hominem attacks, it means they can't
> really refute anything.

A peculiar line of thought. Perhaps you can explain your reasoning?

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: dvus on
"Aatu Koskensilta" <aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi> wrote in message
news:87pr2wpflq.fsf(a)dialatheia.truth.invalid...
> nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes:
>
>> whenever someone resorts to ad hominem attacks, it means they can't
>> really refute anything.
>
> A peculiar line of thought. Perhaps you can explain your reasoning?


I say you have a funny name, therefore I cannot argue that your name is not
funny.

--
dvus

From: nospam on
In article <87pr2wpflq.fsf(a)dialatheia.truth.invalid>, Aatu Koskensilta
<aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi> wrote:

> > whenever someone resorts to ad hominem attacks, it means they can't
> > really refute anything.
>
> A peculiar line of thought. Perhaps you can explain your reasoning?

nothing peculiar about it.
From: Aatu Koskensilta on
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes:

> In article <87pr2wpflq.fsf(a)dialatheia.truth.invalid>, Aatu Koskensilta
> <aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi> wrote:
>
>> > whenever someone resorts to ad hominem attacks, it means they can't
>> > really refute anything.
>>
>> A peculiar line of thought. Perhaps you can explain your reasoning?
>
> nothing peculiar about it.

Well, let's say this line of thought is positively common, perfectly
standard, a veritable banality. Now, perhaps you can explain your
reasoning?

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus