Proposal for an iPad newsgroup
in [Mac Systems]
|
From: JF Mezei on 15 Mar 2010 16:30 This is sad. This was an honest discussion for the creation of a new newsgroup. Nobody would be forced to participate , read it or buy Apple products. The discussions have degenerated into something that makes Priam's arguments against Apple look intelligent and well reasoned. This isn't a debate about Apple products. It is a debate on whether a newsgroup should be created or not. If you don't have any arguments on that issue, then participate in other topics, not this one.
From: Jolly Roger on 15 Mar 2010 17:50 In article <007dcfe7$0$2333$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot(a)vaxination.ca> wrote: > This is sad. > > This was an honest discussion for the creation of a new newsgroup. > Nobody would be forced to participate , read it or buy Apple products. > > The discussions have degenerated into something that makes Priam's > arguments against Apple look intelligent and well reasoned. > > This isn't a debate about Apple products. It is a debate on whether a > newsgroup should be created or not. If you don't have any arguments on > that issue, then participate in other topics, not this one. This is Usenet. Good luck with that. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Warren Oates on 15 Mar 2010 17:56 In article <82qsp5h7087g7p2t4mjjk8g2ipfccmmk0u(a)4ax.com>, david hillstrom <dave(a)meow.org> wrote: > gods and demons, you are ~so~ clueless! with each new post you dig > yourself further down. what grand theater! > BWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAA .... and with each post of yours, you prove how shallow the gene pool is from which spring your moronic parents ... You're a sad little fella, Hillsrom. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer
From: david hillstrom on 15 Mar 2010 19:17 On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:56:58 -0400, Warren Oates <warren.oates(a)gmail.com> wrote: >In article <82qsp5h7087g7p2t4mjjk8g2ipfccmmk0u(a)4ax.com>, > david hillstrom <dave(a)meow.org> wrote: > >> gods and demons, you are ~so~ clueless! with each new post you dig >> yourself further down. what grand theater! >> BWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAA > >... and with each post of yours, you prove how shallow the gene pool is >from which spring your moronic parents ... You're a sad little fella, >Hillsrom. im only sad when the sky is grey! and look! was that a gene pool/parents lame that i did see? amazing. just amazing. <shakes head> -- dave hillstrom zrbj mhm15x3
From: david hillstrom on 15 Mar 2010 19:18
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:11:51 -0500, Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: >In article <82qsp5h7087g7p2t4mjjk8g2ipfccmmk0u(a)4ax.com>, > david hillstrom <dave(a)meow.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:01:17 -0700, Michelle Steiner >> <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: >> >> >In article <8074rmFq06U1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > "dvus" <doug(a)dvenator.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> With the already existing overlap between smart phones and computers it's >> >> hard to devine why anyone would fork over five to eight hundred bucks for >> >> a >> >> modern electronic gizmo without a camera or even a headphone jack unless >> >> it's >> >> to garner bragging rights. >> > >> >OK, so you don't know what you're talking about, but bigots like you rarely >> >do. >> > >> >The iPad does have a headphone jack. >> >> gods and demons, you are ~so~ clueless! with each new post you dig >> yourself further down. what grand theater! >> BWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAA > >Lame. That all you got? no. but i can see i wont need any more. -- dave hillstrom zrbj mhm15x3 |