First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
Why was the Haiti Earthquake was not predictable?
Why was todays, Haiti Earthquake not predictable? It was ~ 7.0 scale. Why cant we model or simulate the complete earth structure on a Super Computer. That may help predict such earth quakes. Say, If we know that some earthquake is going to hit someplace in 1-2 days. People can travel away from the place and ta... 26 Jan 2010 15:32
Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
Many Chinese people believe Dr. Cui Silong, Leifei Institute of New Energy, is stunning the world with his new physics theory Analytical Space-Time, which helps develop most powerful electromagnetic techniques. The new theory fundamentally unified general relativity and quantum mechanics seamlessly with prin... 12 Jan 2010 08:13
Why physicists refuse to measure the one-way speed of light directly?
Why physicists refuse to measure the one-way speed of light directly? The answer: The one-way speed of light is physical distance dependent. BTW that's why they invented a new definition for a meter length: 1 meter=1/299,792,458 light second Using this definition the one-way speed of light is c by definition. K... 10 Feb 2010 02:20
What about electromagnetic time dilation?
I've recently found 30 old years David Apsel's article showing clear experimental argument that electromagnetic field also causes time dilation - such dilation is required to explain muon lifetimes in muonic atoms: http://www.springerlink.com/content/wtr11w113r22g346/ It's strong argument for unification theorie... 8 Feb 2010 06:42
Anti-Einsteiniana: Natural Philosophy Alliance?
PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote in message 3dc9baf5-9166-4d2e-9560-ab762f5d1207(a)e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com On Jan 6, 12:42 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: [snip The following illustration of the glorious paradoxicalness of Divine Albert's Divine Special Relativity involves REDUCTIO... 22 Jan 2010 00:45
Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense - the basic mistake exposed!
Arindam Banerjee wrote: On Jan 4, 9:18 am, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote: Since no self-respecting person has responded negatively to my paper showing that Einstein's theories of relativity are nonsense, I take it that my objections are perfectly valid as they have now passed inter... 7 Jan 2010 12:26
Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense- the basic mistake exposed!
Arindam Banerjee wrote: On Jan 4, 9:18 am, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote: Since no self-respecting person has responded negatively to my paper showing that Einstein's theories of relativity are nonsense, I take it that my objections are perfectly valid as they have now passed internatio... 7 Jan 2010 10:11
Wonderful!!
On Jan 7, 12:03 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: On Jan 7, 12:00 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: On Jan 6, 8:49 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: ... 26 Jan 2010 13:14
The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves
The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1058 "The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) is a consortium of astronomers whose goal is the creation of a galactic scale gravitational wave observatory sensitive to gravitationa... 18 Jan 2010 01:01
First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95