Science is young
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Science is young
Next: Fastest clock
From: BruceS on 12 Jun 2010 20:32 On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/10/2010 10:54 PM, BURT wrote: > > > On Jun 10, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 6/10/2010 2:25 PM, rick_s wrote: > > >>> Sorry for hijacking your thread Burt. lol > >>> Some day they will study it. > > >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gLWTtlMwo4 > > >> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. > > > How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? > > If they can't do that right then blame them not me! > > The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by this monumental basket case.
From: BURT on 12 Jun 2010 20:52 On Jun 12, 5:32 pm, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/10/2010 10:54 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > On Jun 10, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >> On 6/10/2010 2:25 PM, rick_s wrote: > > > >>> Sorry for hijacking your thread Burt. lol > > >>> Some day they will study it. > > > >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gLWTtlMwo4 > > > >> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. > > > > How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? > > > If they can't do that right then blame them not me! > > > The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. > > Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, > preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by > this monumental basket case.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I must be doing something right! Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 12 Jun 2010 22:20 On 6/12/2010 7:32 PM, BruceS wrote: > On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 6/10/2010 10:54 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> On Jun 10, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 6/10/2010 2:25 PM, rick_s wrote: >> >>>>> Sorry for hijacking your thread Burt. lol >>>>> Some day they will study it. >> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gLWTtlMwo4 >> >>>> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. >> >>> How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? >>> If they can't do that right then blame them not me! >> >> The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. > > Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, > preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by > this monumental basket case. There's nothing else going on here. Attempts to start a discussion are wasted. Your visits are probably the only value remaining. Usenet just isn't what it used to be. Even the trolls are only making halfhearted attempts. It is all Obama's fault! BTW, a year after Glenn Beck dissed Hayek's book The Road to Serfdom, he devoted a full ptogram to the book and recommended people read it. That was probably on Tuesday. By Friday the book had climbed to the top of Amazon's best seller list. Pretty good for an anti central planning book that was written in 1944. Strange marketplace.
From: purple on 12 Jun 2010 22:22 On 6/12/2010 7:52 PM, BURT wrote: > On Jun 12, 5:32 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. >> >>>> How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? >>>> If they can't do that right then blame them not me! >> >>> The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. >> >> Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, >> preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by >> this monumental basket case.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > I must be doing something right! You're the man, Mitch! Keep on believing in yourself, no one else does.
From: BURT on 12 Jun 2010 22:32
On Jun 12, 7:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/12/2010 7:52 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 12, 5:32 pm, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. > > >>>> How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? > >>>> If they can't do that right then blame them not me! > > >>> The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. > > >> Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, > >> preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by > >> this monumental basket case.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > I must be doing something right! > > You're the man, Mitch! Keep on believing in yourself, no one > else does.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Science's attitude stinks. It thinks it has somehow gotten better than Albert Einstein. But EInstein was right about quantum mechanics. EInstein was the real winner because he was the only objective scientist. Right now I don't see any body that can act as a watch dog for science and its fraud. Science is full of intellectual dishonesty. Such is Stephen Hawking the Time Keeper. Science comes from a short history. Why not call that a short history of time? If it just began its very first shots cannot be beyond mistake. The short history is built out of mistake. And modern science though it has collected much data is comming from the same place of mistake. Primarily they are extrapolating absolutely everything when that will never cut it. MItch Raemsch |