Science is young
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Science is young
Next: Fastest clock
From: BruceS on 15 Jun 2010 14:58 On Jun 12, 8:20 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/12/2010 7:32 PM, BruceS wrote: > > > > > On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 6/10/2010 10:54 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On Jun 10, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 6/10/2010 2:25 PM, rick_s wrote: > > >>>>> Sorry for hijacking your thread Burt. lol > >>>>> Some day they will study it. > > >>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gLWTtlMwo4 > > >>>> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. > > >>> How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? > >>> If they can't do that right then blame them not me! > > >> The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. > > > Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, > > preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by > > this monumental basket case. > > There's nothing else going on here. Attempts to start a discussion > are wasted. Your visits are probably the only value remaining. I agree. I've tried a few times to start meaningful discussions about math and puzzles. They went nowhere. I do get a kick out of the loonies' posts, when I have time. BURT starts with a couple of completely wacky assumptions, uses bad logic, and comes to ludicrous conclusions. Herc does similarly, but with wildly different results. Every once in a while, we get turds of wizdumb from the Insane Lying Nazi or his somewhat loony fan. That abusive loony with the life- after-death obsession floods the ng from time to time, but he's a broken record. Maybe we should give up, and hope someone else discovers rom and brings it back to life. > Usenet just isn't what it used to be. Even the trolls are only > making halfhearted attempts. > > It is all Obama's fault! Well some of it obviously is, since he's the President and therefore causes everything to happen. However, some of it is leftover from the failures of the Clinton (and even the Carter) regimes, so let's not paint with too broad a brush. > BTW, a year after Glenn Beck dissed Hayek's book The Road to Serfdom, > he devoted a full ptogram to the book and recommended people read it. > > That was probably on Tuesday. By Friday the book had climbed to the > top of Amazon's best seller list. Pretty good for an anti central > planning book that was written in 1944. > > Strange marketplace. I wonder how many of the buyers actually read it. I recommend Donald Knuth and Sergei Lukyanenko. Do you think their Amazon ratings will rise, based on the rom readers who see my post and can't help buying their books to see what all the buzz is about? I hope so.
From: BURT on 15 Jun 2010 15:10
On Jun 15, 11:58 am, BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 12, 8:20 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/12/2010 7:32 PM, BruceS wrote: > > > > On Jun 11, 7:52 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >> On 6/10/2010 10:54 PM, BURT wrote: > > > >>> On Jun 10, 8:51 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 6/10/2010 2:25 PM, rick_s wrote: > > > >>>>> Sorry for hijacking your thread Burt. lol > > >>>>> Some day they will study it. > > > >>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gLWTtlMwo4 > > > >>>> He thrives on attention, any kind of attention. > > > >>> How can that be? Isn't everybody really trying to ignor me? > > >>> If they can't do that right then blame them not me! > > > >> The serious sci.physics* bunch mostly ignore you successfully. > > > > Whereas the silly rom bunch often makes no attempt to ignore him, > > > preferring to get a few giggles out of yet another mindless post by > > > this monumental basket case. > > > There's nothing else going on here. Attempts to start a discussion > > are wasted. Your visits are probably the only value remaining. > > I agree. I've tried a few times to start meaningful discussions about > math and puzzles. They went nowhere. I do get a kick out of the > loonies' posts, when I have time. BURT starts with a couple of > completely wacky assumptions, uses bad logic, a Science is young and if you look at its short history it is full of mistakes. It has never gotten out of that. I say that modern extrapolation science needs to be corrected by a creative science because it has nearly everything wrong. Extrapolation doesn't require work but creativity does. Mitch Raemsch |