From: Unum on
On 2/25/2010 7:03 PM, James wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
>> 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
>> http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
>>
>> By Adam Voiland,
>> NASA�s Earth Science News Team
>>
>> "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
>> NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
>> conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
>> York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
>> warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
>>
>> "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade � due to strong
>> cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean � 2009 saw a return to
>> near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
>> a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
>> a cluster of other years � 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 � as the
>> second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
>
>
> According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
> the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
> 2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
> 1895.

Seeing as how the USA covers only a small percentage of the Earth's
surface that doesn't mean a damn thing does it. All of North America
is only about 5%. And yet the deniers seem to want to focus on cold
snaps on the east coast, lol.
From: Androcles on

"Cold Lazarus" <coldlazarus(a)ymail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25f102db7fa3a0f4989705(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Coffee in Madrid wrote
>>
>> Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
>> mostly just in the USA.
>>
>>
>
> The USA takes up 6.5% of the globe in land mass.
>
> So I guess if it's cooler in the USA in 2009, it must be cooler all over
> the
> world and prove that global warming is just a big hoax.
>
> Especially since climate change is measured over decades, not a decade or
> even
> a year.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Not!

The USA takes up 1.5% of the surface of the globe, 70% is CO2-eating
algae-infested water. Of course some spin doctor will try to make it
seem larger than it really is.



From: Catoni on
On Feb 25, 8:36 pm, Coffee in Madrid <gde...(a)eastlink.ca> wrote:
> In article <4b871d1a$0$2364$d94e5...(a)news.iglou.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  "James" <kingko...(a)iglou.com> wrote:
> > "Sam Wormley" <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
> > > 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
> > >  http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
>
> > > By Adam Voiland,
> > > NASA¹s Earth Science News Team
>
> > > "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
> > > NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
> > > conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
> > > York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
> > > warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
>
> > > "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade ‹ due to strong
> > > cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean ‹ 2009 saw a return to
> > > near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
> > > a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
> > > a cluster of other years ‹ 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 ‹ as the
> > > second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
>
> > According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
> > the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
> > 2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
> > 1895.
>
> Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
> mostly just in the USA.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

>" Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming
curve... seen
> mostly just in the USA."

Plus Canada.... one of the largest countries in the world.
From: Catoni on
On Feb 25, 9:53 pm, "D. Jones" <derekjones23...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Coffee in Madrid wrote
>
> > Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
> > mostly just in the USA.
>
> More snow means more moisture, which any person who skis alpine can tell you
> that it means warmer weather, not colder weather.  When it's really cold, it
> dosn't snow as much or at all, becuause there isn't as much moisture in the
> air.
>
> It's moisture in the air that causes lake effect snow in places that are
> south to colder regions that don't get as much.
>
> Montreal and Toronto have had little snow this year, but that's because it's
> been mild.   When it's very cold, there is also less snow.
>
> The Jet Stream has been very far south this season, bringing arctic air
> further south to areas in the USA, areas that usually enjoy a warm front from
> the south to moderate their weather.  As a result, warm moist air and cold
> arctic air have caused a great deal of snowfall.  While there hasn't been
> massive snowfalls in areas that normally get it.  It's affected the UK as
> well.
>
> The very fact that there has been a lot of snowfall in areas that normally
> don't receive it has to do with abnormal weather patterns.  It's not a
> refutation of global warming theory.  
>
> If some knob comes out of his shotgun shack where the weather this time of
> year normally doesn't have snow, and declares the snow he sees as a
> refutation of global warming?
>
> Well, they need to understand how things work better and stop believing the
> spin.
>
> I hear that the "Gomers" really liked Senator Inhofe's "Al Gore Igloo".
>
> That's their problem.  Alas, they're just too dumb to know.

If some knob comes out of his shotgun shack and sees a bushfire
and declares the bushfire he sees as a
proof of global warming?


Well, they need to understand how things work better and stop
believing the
spin.


From: Catoni on
On Feb 25, 9:59 am, Unum <non...(a)yourbusiness.com> wrote:
> On 2/25/2010 7:03 PM, James wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Sam Wormley" <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
> >> 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
> >>http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
>
> >> By Adam Voiland,
> >> NASA s Earth Science News Team
>
> >> "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
> >> NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
> >> conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
> >> York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
> >> warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
>
> >> "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade due to strong
> >> cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean 2009 saw a return to
> >> near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
> >> a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
> >> a cluster of other years 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 as the
> >> second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
>
> > According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
> > the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
> > 2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
> > 1895.
>
> Seeing as how the USA covers only a small percentage of the Earth's
> surface that doesn't mean a damn thing does it. All of North America
> is only about 5%. And yet the deniers seem to want to focus on cold
> snaps on the east coast, lol.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

plus cold snaps in Britain and Europe, and Siberia, and
China..................