2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
in [Physics]
|
Prev: NASA to Earth: Global Warming Is for Real, Folks!
Next: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
From: Sam Wormley on 25 Feb 2010 19:52 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249 By Adam Voiland, NASA�s Earth Science News Team "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis, conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880. "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade � due to strong cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean � 2009 saw a return to near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with a cluster of other years � 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 � as the second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
From: Just A Guy on 26 Feb 2010 02:46 On Feb 25, 4:52 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade > http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249 > > By Adam Voiland, > NASAs Earth Science News Team > > "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new > NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis, > conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New > York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the > warmest year since modern records began in 1880. > > "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade due to strong > cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean 2009 saw a return to near-record > global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of a degree > cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with a cluster of > other years 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 as the second warmest > year since recordkeeping began". That certainly does imply local warming. I'm convinced.
From: Tom P on 26 Feb 2010 06:48 Peter Muehlbauer wrote: > Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009: Second warmest year on record > > What record? > > What makes a year important within a cherrypicked slope and within a > flyspeck of time compared to hundreds of bigger ups and downs during the last > 12000 years of interglacial? > > <AGW mode> Shrill... SHRILL ... S H R I L L !!!!!!111oneeleven </> Translation - the mill farmer can't think of anything to say.
From: Earl Evleth on 26 Feb 2010 07:14 On 26/02/10 12:17, in article i5bfo5du1cmvhpnfcn6fj17bdsfsrclesm(a)nntp.frankenexpress.de, "Peter Muehlbauer" <spamtrap.AT(a)AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote: >> 2009: Second warmest year on record > > What record? The record since accurate measurements have been made.
From: Earl Evleth on 26 Feb 2010 08:43
On 26/02/10 13:18, in article jvefo5haa7u0g6qclv7ve8dlidd4msr9e7(a)nntp.frankenexpress.de, "Peter Muehlbauer" <spamtrap.AT(a)AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote: >> The record since accurate measurements have been made. > > Since this is the birth of Earth? Certainly not accurate. Proxie determined temperatures have a certain error bar, depending on the particular proxie More over they have to be taken world wide. So a particular location or limited geographical area will give unreliable results for a global estimate We are running into that right now. Since the US has not has the same degree of warming as has existed globally Americans get a distorted view. Looking at the snow from the front room window is not sufficient. You deniers will grab and run with any thing as well as make stupid coments like >Since this is the birth of Earth?` However from you it is expected. |