From: James on
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
> 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
> http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
>
> By Adam Voiland,
> NASA�s Earth Science News Team
>
> "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
> NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
> conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
> York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
> warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
>
> "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade � due to strong
> cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean � 2009 saw a return to
> near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
> a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
> a cluster of other years � 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 � as the
> second warmest year since recordkeeping began".


According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
1895.

From: BURT on
On Feb 25, 5:03 pm, "James" <kingko...(a)iglou.com> wrote:
> "Sam Wormley" <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
>
>
>
>
>
> > 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
> >  http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
>
> > By Adam Voiland,
> > NASA s Earth Science News Team
>
> > "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
> > NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
> > conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
> > York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
> > warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
>
> > "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade due to strong
> > cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean 2009 saw a return to
> > near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
> > a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
> > a cluster of other years 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 as the
> > second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
>
> According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
> the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
> 2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
> 1895.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Watch out for those up and comming ice ages!!!

Mitch Raemsch
From: Coffee in Madrid on
In article <4b871d1a$0$2364$d94e5ade(a)news.iglou.com>,
"James" <kingkongg(a)iglou.com> wrote:

> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:wrSdnQAO_q2lhhrWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com
> > 2009: Second warmest year on record; end of warmest decade
> > http://climate.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?NewsID=249
> >
> > By Adam Voiland,
> > NASA�s Earth Science News Team
> >
> > "2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new
> > NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis,
> > conducted by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New
> > York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the
> > warmest year since modern records began in 1880.
> >
> > "Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade � due to strong
> > cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean � 2009 saw a return to
> > near-record global temperatures. The past year was only a fraction of
> > a degree cooler than 2005, the hottest year on record, and tied with
> > a cluster of other years � 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 � as the
> > second warmest year since recordkeeping began".
>
>
> According to the U.S. National Climate Data Center 2008 temperatures in
> the USA were below the 115 year average for most of the country. U.S.
> 2009 summer temperatures were also very cool, the 34th coolest since
> 1895.

Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
mostly just in the USA.
From: D. Jones on
Coffee in Madrid wrote

> Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
> mostly just in the USA.

More snow means more moisture, which any person who skis alpine can tell you
that it means warmer weather, not colder weather. When it's really cold, it
dosn't snow as much or at all, becuause there isn't as much moisture in the
air.

It's moisture in the air that causes lake effect snow in places that are
south to colder regions that don't get as much.

Montreal and Toronto have had little snow this year, but that's because it's
been mild. When it's very cold, there is also less snow.

The Jet Stream has been very far south this season, bringing arctic air
further south to areas in the USA, areas that usually enjoy a warm front from
the south to moderate their weather. As a result, warm moist air and cold
arctic air have caused a great deal of snowfall. While there hasn't been
massive snowfalls in areas that normally get it. It's affected the UK as
well.

The very fact that there has been a lot of snowfall in areas that normally
don't receive it has to do with abnormal weather patterns. It's not a
refutation of global warming theory.

If some knob comes out of his shotgun shack where the weather this time of
year normally doesn't have snow, and declares the snow he sees as a
refutation of global warming?

Well, they need to understand how things work better and stop believing the
spin.

I hear that the "Gomers" really liked Senator Inhofe's "Al Gore Igloo".

That's their problem. Alas, they're just too dumb to know.

From: Cold Lazarus on
Coffee in Madrid wrote
>
> Its just a temporary downward blip in the global warming curve... seen
> mostly just in the USA.
>
>

The USA takes up 6.5% of the globe in land mass.

So I guess if it's cooler in the USA in 2009, it must be cooler all over the
world and prove that global warming is just a big hoax.

Especially since climate change is measured over decades, not a decade or even
a year.

Makes sense.

Not!