Prev: HAWKING EXOPHOBIA
Next: Quantum Gravity 367.0: Most Stable Distributions including Levy and Landau and Dirac Delta Function are Counterexamples To Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
From: Xan Du on 26 Apr 2010 19:06 On 4/26/2010 7:03 PM, HVAC wrote: > "Xan Du"<xan747(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hr522q$4ad$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >>> However, ETs do exist. >> >> I'm not likely to argue no to that one. > > > That's because you, like Guth, are an idiot. > > That's not a knock, it's just the way it is. lol, ok. > PS- The Drake equation is bullshit on an epic scale. That may indeed be true, but you sure haven't made any kind of case for that contention. -Xan
From: Xan Du on 26 Apr 2010 19:07 On 4/26/2010 2:29 PM, Bast wrote: > Double-A wrote: >> On Apr 26, 5:14 am, HVAC<mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> THE aliens are out there and Earth had better watch out, at least >>> according to Stephen Hawking. He has suggested that extraterrestrials >>> are almost certain to exist � but that instead of seeking them out, >>> humanity should be doing all it that can to avoid any contact. >> >> >> Of course Hawking knows there are aliens. He reads alt.astronomy! >> >> >>> The suggestions come in a new documentary series in which Hawking, one >>> of the world�s leading scientists, will set out his latest thinking on >>> some of the universe�s greatest mysteries. >>> >>> Alien life, he will suggest, is almost certain to exist in many other >>> parts of the universe: not just in planets, but perhaps in the centre >>> of stars or even floating in interplanetary space. >> >> >> Life in the centre of stars? And you think OUR ideas are kookie! >> >> >>> Hawking�s logic on aliens is, for him, unusually simple. The universe, >>> he points out, has 100 billion galaxies, each containing hundreds of >>> millions of stars. In such a big place, Earth is unlikely to be the >>> only planet where life has evolved. >>> >>> �To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about >>> aliens perfectly rational,� he said. �The real challenge is to work >>> out what aliens might actually be like.� >>> >>> The answer, he suggests, is that most of it will be the equivalent of >>> microbes or simple animals � the sort of life that has dominated Earth >>> for most of its history. >>> >>> One scene in his documentary for the Discovery Channel shows herds of >>> two-legged herbivores browsing on an alien cliff-face where they are >>> picked off by flying, yellow lizard-like predators. Another shows >>> glowing fluorescent aquatic animals forming vast shoals in the oceans >>> thought to underlie the thick ice coating Europa, one of the moons of >>> Jupiter. >> >> >> How about porpoises? > > > I think his porpiose was to keep his name in the news He's doing a whale of a job. -Xan
From: HVAC on 26 Apr 2010 19:33 "Xan Du" <xan747(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hr569f$t09$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> PS- The Drake equation is bullshit on an epic scale. > > That may indeed be true, but you sure haven't made any kind of case for > that contention. The work has been done. Go to the local library and check out a book titled 'Rare Earth'. Get back to me after you read it. -- When HVAC does a push-up, he's not pushing himself up, he's pushing the world down.
From: Ala on 26 Apr 2010 21:30 "Painius" <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote in message news:4bd60180$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > "HVAC" <mr.hvac(a)gmail.com> wrote... > in message news:hr4dfv$1go$1(a)hvac.motzarella.org... >> "oldcoot88" <oldcoot7074(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4181ad19-afe1-431b-ae2e-76c3f1a7b584(a)t14g2000prm.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> There yoosta be a self-proclaimed extraterrestrial alien on here named >>> 'Darla'. She was presented repeatedly with a 'litmus test' of alien- >>> hood which went thusly: Any technologically advanced race capable of >>> interstellar travel would understand the true nature of space and the >>> causal mechanism of gravity. This would be basic kindergarden stuff. >>> It would be prerequisite to building a hyperdrive. So please explain >>> the true nature of space and the cause of gravity, and the principle >>> of hyperdrive. Of course Darla hadn't a clue and bombed every time, >>> presenting somethig to the effect that this is 'Level 6' data and >>> cannot be divulged to earthlings. :) >> >> But of course! >> >> Sweet 'Darla' is a 54 year old man! > > She (or he) might take that as a compliment, since > she's supposed to be more like 54 *million* years > old. Actually even older than that, since she was > supposed to have learned how to be a warrior by > fighting with T-rexes. > > And since she's supposedly "fathered" a child, the > "man" part would not be seen by her in a bad light. > > If you want to mow Darla down with words, you > both need to try harder. As i recall, oc, it wasn't > she didn't have a clue and bombed because she > didn't respond. She *did* respond, and you just > didn't care for her answer. She called it "Level 6" > in the beginning, but later she did reveal stuff > about space and gravity, but these things did not > fully jive with your beliefs. And as i recall, there > were some things she and her "crew" said that > actually *did* jive with your and Wolter's ideas. > > Nothing wrong with being hostile, tho. Personally, > i think she's here to suck all the resources off our > planet. Some things are getting a bit too scarce a > bit too fast. Like coffee. My favorite brand ain't > always so easy to find these days. Wassup wit dat??? > Darla is a female. I believe she is a bit older than 54. That's a non issue far as I can tell. Also, the issue isn't whether or not she is sweet. The problem is: she is boring.
From: razvlekatsa zabavlatsa on 26 Apr 2010 21:37
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:30:19 -0400, "Ala" <alackrity(a)comcast.net> wrote: >The problem is: she is boring. You seem to have a problem. You ask, you get, you don't understand and then you're bored, so you ask the same questions all over again. The reason you can't understand the information given to you because your feudal system has not and can not provide you the means to understand the information. Conversely, just because you didn't understand, does not mean others didn't. And they have. So what's your problem? --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net --- |