Shhhhhhhhhh
in [Physics]
|
Prev: HAWKING EXOPHOBIA
Next: Quantum Gravity 367.0: Most Stable Distributions including Levy and Landau and Dirac Delta Function are Counterexamples To Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
From: Double-A on 27 Apr 2010 14:19 On Apr 27, 8:05 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...(a)maol.com> wrote: > "bert" <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote in message... > > news:7fb63379-6956-4b1c-b9b9-8fb53f852c3e(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 27, 4:13 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...(a)maol.com> wrote: > > > Ooobie wan Ka-newbie ("razvlekatsa zabavlatsa" <n...(a)net.net>) wrote... > > in messagenews:3u5ct5hb9a1366cprdqllns6bhne2om645(a)4ax.com... > > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:11:28 -0400, "Painius" > > > <starswirlern...(a)maol.com> wrote: > > > >>she did reveal stuff > > >>about space and gravity > > > > As long as feudal systems are in control of you and your > > > establishments, you will never have the means to > > > understand space or gravity. > > > Thrall us with your acumen, Ooobie wan. > > Darla was far out. She could think outside the box.Was she fiction or > non-fiction is up to those that read her posts. She was loved and > hated. I like many loved her.Her post were read by all,and she is in > reality missed by all TreBert > > $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > > Well Thank You, TreBert ! > > Er, uhm, i mean, uhm, YES, i agree that those Darla > posts could be very interesting and compelling ! <g> Haha! How long is Darla going to remain "lost in space"? Or is it, "Goodnight sweet princess." > Anyway, the newbie seems to think that we still have > some kind of feudal system here in the US. What s/he > does not seem to take into account is that real feudals > no longer exist anywhere on the planet ! Ethiopia was > the last bastion for feudal systems, and "The Big E's" > feudal system died out when Haile Selassie kicked the > bucket. > > So forget feudal systems. There are no feudal systems. So how come in England the noblemen still own most of the land? > happy days and... > starry starry nights! > > -- > Indelibly yours, > Paine Ellsworth Double-A
From: HVAC on 27 Apr 2010 14:28 "Double-A" <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote in message news:cf75dbc0-1638-43d5-a1aa-21c43b368a54(a)z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... Do you suppose we could all take up a collection to send Brad where he really wants to go: Venus? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If *I* see him, I'll give him a trip to the moon. No charge.
From: Darwin123 on 27 Apr 2010 17:06 On Apr 26, 8:14 am, HVAC <mr.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I suspect there could be life and intelligence out there in forms we > cant conceive, he said. Just as a chimpanzee cant understand > quantum theory, it could be there are aspects of reality that are > beyond the capacity of our brains. Suppose there is another civilization out there, only 4.4 MLY from earth. Suppose there is no other civilization between them and us. This would be a rather large density of civilizations. The visible universe is on or around 13 BLY in diameter. There could be plenty of civilizations in the visible universe, even if they are only on average 4.4 MLY away from each other. How would we prove, or for that matter disprove, the existence of such a civilization given such a low density of civilizations? I am asking this as a question in physics. Conjecture is a nice beginning for science. However, lets start conjecturing about experiments.
From: Ala on 27 Apr 2010 19:58 "Double-A" <double-a3(a)hush.com> wrote in message news:cf75dbc0-1638-43d5-a1aa-21c43b368a54(a)z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... >Do you suppose we could all take up a collection to send Brad where he >really wants to go: Venus? seriously, whoever heard of traveling a whole half mile on a bike, there oughta be a law
From: Ala on 27 Apr 2010 20:12
"razvlekatsa zabavlatsa" <net(a)net.net> wrote in message news:tnfct5t05ef7n4nqqtkod8ki9n0cdjj6po(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:30:19 -0400, "Ala" <alackrity(a)comcast.net> > wrote: > >>The problem is: she is boring. > > You seem to have a problem. You ask, you get, you don't understand > and then you're bored, so you ask the same questions all over again. > > The reason you can't understand the information given to you because > your feudal system has not and can not provide you the means to > understand the information. > > Conversely, just because you didn't understand, does not mean > others didn't. > > And they have. > > So what's your problem? > She's boring. We understand the information. Moreover, we always had it way before she did and it is simplistic and elementary school stuff. What's to understand. She is boring. |