From: Bella Jones on
Flavio Matani <flavio_mataniTAKETHISBITOUT(a)mac.com> wrote:

> Graeme <Graeme(a)greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In message <1jd5so8.99vcyf1p6zti6N%me9(a)privacy.net>
> > me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
[...]
> > > >
> > > > Good point. I think my IQ drops year by year.
> > >
> > > Although the objection to that is that you pay something for the phone
> > > when you go less than �45, anywhere.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Easy sum, is the price more than 90 quid? If so go for the �45/m and
> > drop it after 9 months. If less than �90 then you gamble on only
> > wanting the lower tariff.
>
> That was my calculation, and what I did at the time.

Thanks for all the input, everyone. Of course I still haven't made my
decision! I would go with O2 but am conerned about the coverage factor.
Everyone says such different things.

--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk
From: Woody on
Bella Jones <me9(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> Flavio Matani <flavio_mataniTAKETHISBITOUT(a)mac.com> wrote:
>
> > Graeme <Graeme(a)greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > In message <1jd5so8.99vcyf1p6zti6N%me9(a)privacy.net>
> > > me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
> [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > Good point. I think my IQ drops year by year.
> > > >
> > > > Although the objection to that is that you pay something for the phone
> > > > when you go less than �45, anywhere.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Easy sum, is the price more than 90 quid? If so go for the �45/m and
> > > drop it after 9 months. If less than �90 then you gamble on only
> > > wanting the lower tariff.
> >
> > That was my calculation, and what I did at the time.
>
> Thanks for all the input, everyone. Of course I still haven't made my
> decision! I would go with O2 but am conerned about the coverage factor.
> Everyone says such different things.

I have never had *no* signal anywhere I have been in london where I
should have had it, ie, out of the tube. There are a few times where the
data has been on slow, near old street station, parts of the overground
tube etc, but nothing that would particulalry put me off getting them.

If I had your choice, I would go for O2. I don't really much liek them,
but I just feel that vodafone are likely to put some silly restriction
on it (this could be my own prejudice against them though) and orange i
have heard dont have the network for it. And my friend has just got an
orange one and had a problem setting up her MMS, I don't know why it
needed setting up if she just bought it.


--
Woody
From: Jon B on
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> Jon B <black.hole(a)jonbradbury.com> wrote:
>
> > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/01/2010 12:17, Geoff Berrow wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:00:15 +0000, me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Still tossing up between O2 and voda.
> > > >
> > > > I'm with O2, daughter is with Voda.
> > > >
> > > > Voda seems to have much better coverage.
> > >
> > > I would imagine it depends on the area but in general I would assume
> > > they do. Do they have the visual voicemail and data plans?
> > >
> > > I have noticed since having an iPhone that my texting rate has shot up
> > > as it works much better - do they give you enough of that?
> >
> > That an there is no indication of how long your text is.
>
> I find that a bit of a pain, as a friend of mine had an old phone that
> wouldn't recieve a multi-part text. Ie, not just not get the first part,
> just get a blank text.
>
> Luckily she has just broken her phone and got an iPhone, so I guess it
> is not a pain anymore!

Yeah not many people have a phone that can't handle multipart texts, and
they are the types I wouldn't send a multipart text to, generally
because they're unlikely to even know how to get into the texts if their
phone is that old.
--
Jon B
Above email address IS valid.
<http://www.bramley-computers.co.uk/> Apple Laptop Repairs.
From: zoara on
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2010-01-30 10:33:22 +0000, D.M. Procida said:
> > >
> > > > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>> I doubt I've sent as many as fifty in my life!
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh get with the program grandad.
> > > >
> > > > Make it 51, I sent another last night. Hip to the beat, Daddy-o!
> > >
> > > Many happy returns you old codger!
> >
> > Thank you. It was my 40th birthday. I spent the evening in the
> > emergency
> > medical admission unit. Not on my own account, I should say, but I
> > still
> > had other plans.
>
> Happy birthday for that and hope it worked out ok.
> I have never done that on my birthday, only christmas eve in Motreal.
> At
> least it makes for a memorable event.

It certainly doesn't sound like a fun way to spend an important day.

Happy big four-oh anyway, Daniele.

-zoara-

--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm
From: Bella Jones on
Graeme <Graeme(a)greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> In message <1jd5so8.99vcyf1p6zti6N%me9(a)privacy.net>
> me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:
>
[...]
> > > > Yeah, I'd recommend getting a lower tariff than you think you want.
> > > > They'll happily let you upgrade to a higher-priced tariff right away if
> > > > you chose the wrong one, but you'd have to wait a while to downgrade.
> > > > There would always be expenses in choosing the wrong tariffs, but I
> > > > reckon they'd work out to be less by choosing a too-low tariff than a
> > > > too-high one.
> > >
> > > Good point. I think my IQ drops year by year.
> >
> > Although the objection to that is that you pay something for the phone
> > when you go less than �45, anywhere.
> >
>
> Easy sum, is the price more than 90 quid? If so go for the �45/m and drop it
> after 9 months. If less than �90 then you gamble on only wanting the lower
> tariff.

OK, about to go with O2 probably - but can you explain this calculation?

Where does the �90 come from? I am almost dyscalculic.



--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk