From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:24:52 +0000, Dorian Gray
<D.Gray(a)picture.invalid> wrote:

>People in general also often prefer texts because it means they can keep
>private what they are talking about on the phone from the other people
>they're with, as well as not divulging where they are or who they are
>with, to the person at the other end of the phone. Texts can also be
>useful while in seminars, in packed trains, etc, where a phone call
>might be rude/impossible because of those around you.
>
>So the person you might want to call might not be able to pick up the
>call, but can read and answer a text. I would prefer to leave a
>Voicemail if they can't pick up, but I find that people find them
>inconvenient compared to reading a text. For one thing, you can't
>surreptitiously listen to a Voicemail, which you would probably need to
>do if you're in a situation where you can't take a call. Plus it takes
>a lot longer.

Texts also allow the other party to answer at their leisure, rather
than the NOW! demand that a phone call urges, even to those
strong-willed enough to not answer. I find that invaluable, since I'm
such a polite chap.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
Actually, the Singularity seems rather useful in the entire work avoidance
field. "I _could_ write up that report now but if I put it off, I may well
become a weakly godlike entity, at which point not only will I be able to
type faster but my comments will be more on-target." - James Nicoll
From: Dorian Gray on
In article <d4d8m5tb6t694kub20q2psapen11vm4lkr(a)4ax.com>,
Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote:

> Texts also allow the other party to answer at their leisure, rather
> than the NOW! demand that a phone call urges, even to those
> strong-willed enough to not answer.

It's interesting, carrying on with my gender-differences theme, that men
I know seem happy to answer texts asynchronously when convenient, and
use it to send information, but many women I know expect an immediate
response to texts, even when they're not asking for anything nor giving
any useful information.
From: Flavio Matani on
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> On 29/01/2010 15:16, Geoff Berrow wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:29:33 +0000, Woody<usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/01/2010 12:17, Geoff Berrow wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:00:15 +0000, me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Still tossing up between O2 and voda.
> >>>
> >>> I'm with O2, daughter is with Voda.
> >>>
> >>> Voda seems to have much better coverage.
> >>
> >> I would imagine it depends on the area but in general I would assume
> >> they do. Do they have the visual voicemail and data plans?
> >
> > It does depend on area. If you live in Ilfracombe O2 is useless. It's
> > not too bad where I live and certainly better than 3 who I was with
> > before.
>
> Thats why I had said that she needs to check the area. O2 is ok here but
> 3 was better (which is odd, as I thought they shared masts). Where I
> used to live, voda and tmobile were useless, whereas o2 was ok and
> orange was good.
>
> > don't know anything about the Voda plans (my daughters have other
> > phones) but I'm on the 35 quid a month job which has 600 minutes and
> > 500 texts (IIRC) which is more than I can ever use, even though my
> > texting has increased now that I have a phone with a decent UI
>
>
> I am on �35, which is what put me off for so long, that it cost that
> much for just 600 minutes (my last plan was 750 mins for �25). I do use
> a lot more texts now though.

I'm on O2 half a block away from where she is and haven't ever had
problems with coverage. I also have a mi-fi- on 3 and that's been a
whole different story...



--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com
From: Bella Jones on
Flavio Matani <flavio_mataniTAKETHISBITOUT(a)mac.com> wrote:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 29/01/2010 15:16, Geoff Berrow wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Thats why I had said that she needs to check the area. O2 is ok here but
> > 3 was better (which is odd, as I thought they shared masts). Where I
> > used to live, voda and tmobile were useless, whereas o2 was ok and
> > orange was good.
> >
> > > don't know anything about the Voda plans (my daughters have other
> > > phones) but I'm on the 35 quid a month job which has 600 minutes and
> > > 500 texts (IIRC) which is more than I can ever use, even though my
> > > texting has increased now that I have a phone with a decent UI
> >
> >
> > I am on �35, which is what put me off for so long, that it cost that
> > much for just 600 minutes (my last plan was 750 mins for �25). I do use
> > a lot more texts now though.
>
> I'm on O2 half a block away from where she is and haven't ever had
> problems with coverage. I also have a mi-fi- on 3 and that's been a
> whole different story...

I've been tossing up between 35 and 45 quid. 45 quid feels such a bloody
lot though. And there will always be extras slipping through on top.

--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk
From: Flavio Matani on
Bella Jones <me9(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> Flavio Matani <flavio_mataniTAKETHISBITOUT(a)mac.com> wrote:
>
> > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/01/2010 15:16, Geoff Berrow wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > > Thats why I had said that she needs to check the area. O2 is ok here but
> > > 3 was better (which is odd, as I thought they shared masts). Where I
> > > used to live, voda and tmobile were useless, whereas o2 was ok and
> > > orange was good.
> > >
> > > > don't know anything about the Voda plans (my daughters have other
> > > > phones) but I'm on the 35 quid a month job which has 600 minutes and
> > > > 500 texts (IIRC) which is more than I can ever use, even though my
> > > > texting has increased now that I have a phone with a decent UI
> > >
> > >
> > > I am on �35, which is what put me off for so long, that it cost that
> > > much for just 600 minutes (my last plan was 750 mins for �25). I do use
> > > a lot more texts now though.
> >
> > I'm on O2 half a block away from where she is and haven't ever had
> > problems with coverage. I also have a mi-fi- on 3 and that's been a
> > whole different story...
>
> I've been tossing up between 35 and 45 quid. 45 quid feels such a bloody
> lot though. And there will always be extras slipping through on top.

Initially I took the 45 quid option and eventually went down to the �35
one -and still am only using a small fraction of my text and talk time
allowance -even though I do text a lot. They only let you downgrade the
tariff after 9 months.



--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com