From: Andrew Usher on
j...(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> > New Year is not among the holidays Kirshenbaum mentioned. I exclude it
> > from my consideration as by its nature it can't be fixed to a
> > particular day of the week.
> >
> > Andrew Usher
>
> Neither can most holidays.

So?

> The original issues were international and total recognition.

Whose issues? I never said _total_ recognition, only widespread
recognition. You can't deny that knowledge of Christmas and Easter is
pretty widespread, and basically universal in the Western world even
among non-Christians.

Andrew Usher
From: Andrew Usher on
Robert Bannister wrote:

> > 'One' is not, grammatically, a pronoun. It is a nominalised adjective
> > (the number one) that is used in place of a pronoun.
>
> Are you positive it isn't related to French "on" (as opposed to French
> "un")?

Well, it certainly could be, and that is the usual derivation given,
although I don't think there's any direct proof.

Anglo-French 'on' and Middle English 'one' would be very close in
pronunciation, both being some variant of [On]. But still, I think if
that was the origin it was assimilated into English as if it were the
number one.

Andrew Usher
From: Evan Kirshenbaum on
Andrew Usher <k_over_hbarc(a)yahoo.com> writes:

> Evan Kirshenbaum wrote:
>
>> >> I suspect that you could find people celebrating Pesach, Purim,
>> >> Rosh Hashanah, and Yom Kippur in as many countries as any four
>> >> Christian holidays.
>> >
>> > Well, yes, but not _more people_.
>>
>> Is that how you construe "more international"? By that measure,
>> Gandhi's birthday or the PRC's National Day are far more international
>> than any of the Jewish holidays (and, probably, many of the Christian
>> ones), even though they're celebrated in far few countries.
>
> I think you know what I mean. A national holiday can't be
> international no matter how many people there are observing it.

No, actually, I don't know what you mean. The only reasonable meaning
of "more international" I can think of is something like "celebrated
in more countries", possibly with some reasonable restriction on what
it means for a holiday to count as being "celebrated" in a country,
and possibly with a caveat that you should have some discount for
countries that are historically closely related or geographically
close to one another.

But I'll bite. What did you mean by "more international"?

--
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------
HP Laboratories |A handgun is like a Lawyer. You
1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |don't want it lying around where
Palo Alto, CA 94304 |the children might be exposed to
|it, but when you need one, you need
kirshenbaum(a)hpl.hp.com |it RIGHT NOW, and nothing else will
(650)857-7572 |do.
| Bill McNutt
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/


From: tony cooper on
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:14:04 +0800, Robert Bannister
<robban1(a)bigpond.com> wrote:

>Ant�nio Marques wrote:
>
>> It's not what you think. Either the Church's message is universal and
>> Christ did found one Church, or it isn't.
>
>Now there's a new one: the first I've heard that Jesus founded or even
>wanted a church.

I thought he delegated the job to Peter.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Brian M. Scott on
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:48:34 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim(a)verizon.net> wrote in
<news:b635eda9-c279-4467-91f7-041a0adef830(a)g23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

> On Feb 23, 12:27�pm, Hatunen <hatu...(a)cox.net> wrote:

[...]

>> I've hear it commented that daylight time was invented by
>> an Amrican Indian who, finding his blanket too short to
>> reach his chin, cut off the lower end of the blanket and
>> sewed it onto the upper end.

[...]

> Is there a reason for attaching that story to a particular
> ethnicity? [...]

Quite possibly accuracy in reporting.

Brian