From: Skitt on
PaulJK wrote:

> We invented DST to set clocks back one hour in summer

forward

> because in summer it's bright earlier.
> In summer kids go to school an hour earlier but in winter
> they go to school at the time they always used to go.

--
Skitt (AmE)

From: Brian M. Scott on
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:39:35 +0000, Ant�nio Marques
<antonioprm(a)sapo.pt> wrote in
<news:hm13st$kct$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

> Brian M. Scott wrote (23-02-2010 16:56):

>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:16:59 +0000, Ant�nio Marques
>> <antonioprm(a)sapo.pt> wrote in
>> <news:hm0kgg$548$1(a)news.eternal-september.org> in
>> sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

>>> Adam Funk wrote (23-02-2010 11:39):

>>>> On 2010-02-23, Andrew Usher wrote:

>>>>>>> The Catholic Church has stated, I believe more than
>>>>>>> once (it's linked to somewhere in this thread) that
>>>>>>> fixing Easter to a particular week would be
>>>>>>> acceptable.

>>>> ("Catholic" is a commonly used but imprecise abbreviation
>>>> of "Roman Catholic".)

>>>>> Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>>>>>> "The Catholic Church" (which refers to no specific
>>>>>> organization) hasn't spoken for all of Christendom for
>>>>>> nearly half a millennium.

>>>>> 'The Catholic Church' or simply 'The Church' refers to
>>>>> exactly one organisation. It's disingenuous to pretend
>>>>> otherwise. Also, it's been longer than half a
>>>>> millennium if one includes the East.

>>>> The "Roman Catholic Church", the "Old Catholic Church",
>>>> and the "Polish National Catholic Church" are
>>>> independent of each other.

>>>> The "Eastern Catholic Churches" are under papal authority
>>>> but I don't think they describe themselves as "Roman
>>>> Catholic".

>>> Gad, not again! You're trolling, aren't you?

>>> "Roman Catholic" ISN'T AN OFFICIAL SELF-DESIGNATION.
>>> ANYWHERE.

>> It and RC are, however, widely used popular designations.

> Indeed, but what relevance does that have when trying to
> ascertain what the precise terminology is?

It's not apparent that any particular notion of precise
terminology is relevant to Peter's deliberate
misunderstanding and the subsequent comments thereon.

>>> In the tradition from which the Roman and the Greek
>>> Churches come, the Church has no splitting qualifiers.

>> But this isn't really relevant outside that tradition.

> But what is the relevance of the outside of that tradition
> to what the ECC think of themselves?

You seem to be involved in a different discussion.

>>> From the Church's point of view, there aren't multiple
>>> churches.

>> But from an external point of view there very obviously are.

> It depends, but what is the relevance of any external
> point of view to the internal point of view which is
> being discussed?

You may be discussing an internal point of view; I am not,
and it's not clear to me that others are doing so, either.

[...]

>>> but it *is* accurate to say that the ECC are 'non-Latin
>>> CC', even if it's somewhat unwieldy.

>> Which in a widely used popular terminology becomes 'Catholic
>> but not Roman Catholic'.

> In widely used popular terminologies spiders are insects,
> Cycadaceae are palms and the moon is made of mozzarella.

Not comparable. 'Catholic but not Roman Catholic' actually
does identify the churches in question.

[...]

Brian
From: Brian M. Scott on
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:41:20 -0800, Skitt
<skitt99(a)comcast.net> wrote in
<news:hm17gp$89l$1(a)news.albasani.net> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

> PaulJK wrote:

>> We invented DST to set clocks back one hour in summer

> forward

That's the usual terminology, at least in the U.S., but it
does depends on one's point of view.

[...]

Brian
From: Yusuf B Gursey on
On Feb 23, 1:39 pm, Yusuf B Gursey <y...(a)theworld.com> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 1:19 pm, António Marques <antonio...(a)sapo.pt> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yusuf B Gursey wrote (23-02-2010 17:52):
>
> > > On Feb 23, 6:39 am, Adam Funk<a24...(a)ducksburg.com>  wrote:
> > >> On 2010-02-23, Andrew Usher wrote:
>
> > >>>>> The Catholic Church has stated, I believe more than once (it's linked
> > >>>>> to somewhere in this thread) that fixing Easter to a particular week
> > >>>>> would be acceptable.
>
> > >> ("Catholic" is a commonly used but imprecise abbreviation of "Roman
> > >> Catholic".)
>
> > >>> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > >>>> "The Catholic Church" (which refers to no specific organization)
> > >>>> hasn't spoken for all of Christendom for nearly half a millennium.
>
> > >>> 'The Catholic Church' or simply 'The Church' refers to exactly one
> > >>> organisation. It's disingenuous to pretend otherwise. Also, it's been
> > >>> longer than half a millennium if one includes the East.
>
> > >> The "Roman Catholic Church", the "Old Catholic Church", and the
> > >> "Polish National Catholic Church" are independent of each other.
>
> > >> The "Eastern Catholic Churches" are under papal authority but I don't
> > >> think they describe themselves as "Roman Catholic".
>
> > > AFAIK that's correct. the Arabic name for the *Roman* Catholic Church
> > > literally translates as "the Latin Catholic". "Rumi" Catholics are
> > > Greek (or Byzantine) Catholics (under papla authority but using the
> > > Greek rite).
>
> > *How* is it correct? *How* does arabic 'roman catholic' for the eastern
> > catholics vs 'latin catholic' for the western catholics support Adam's
> > impression?
>
> > > Latin rite Catholics are a very small minority in the
> > > Middle East, though I knew a Palestinian whose father had a high rank
> > > in Jerusalem (I think they are mostly centered about there, though
> > > found elsewhere in diaspora)
>
> > What I wonder is - are there 'old' latin-rite communities there alongside
> > 'modern' ones (western migrants), or do they all mingle? It would be a
> > tiny-minority within a tiny minority.
>
> well, I assume they would go to the same churches. in the main holy
> places Latin is used when Catholics have their turn.

and all of the Catholics are partial to the French-run schools.
From: Trond Engen on
Brian M. Scott skrev:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:41:20 -0800, Skitt
> <skitt99(a)comcast.net> wrote in
> <news:hm17gp$89l$1(a)news.albasani.net> in
> sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:
>
>> PaulJK wrote:
>>
>>> We invented DST to set clocks back one hour in summer
>>
>> forward
>
> That's the usual terminology, at least in the U.S., but it
> does depends on one's point of view.

And everything is the other way around in New Zealand.

--
Trond Engen